Hope for Restoring Sight

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Peter Mallen

Promising new results come from The Schepens Eye Research Institute today that demonstrate how surgeons might eventually be able to turn a blind eye back into a seeing one. The work, reported in the journal Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, marks the first instance of transplanting stem cells, the progenitors of all cells, into diseased eyes in hopes of regenerating damaged retinas--thin sheets of cells in the back eye that collect patterns of light. In fact, many forms of blindness result from illnesses that injure the retina, including macular degeneration, glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy.

Michael Young and colleagues derived neural stem cells from the hippocampus of adult rats and then injected them into the gel-like vitrous of eyes in rats showing retinal degeneration. In one-, four- and 10-week-old animals, the donor cells not only took, but actually migrated to the right place, started assuming the characteristics of retinal cells and extended into the optic nerve, which links the eye to the brain. In older animals the neural cells were also widely accepted. Surprisingly, the transplants worked best in the most damaged eyes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"These cells somehow sense that they are needed, and begin to differentiate into cells that could take on the job of retinal neurons," Young comments. "It is exciting that neural progenitor cells are capable of responding to injury cues in the mature central nervous system." Although Young cautions that there is still a long way to go, he adds that "We are optimistic that this technique will one day restore vision to those who have been blinded by disease or injury."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe