Hospital Stay Helps

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although outpatient treatment of psychiatric problems can be cost-efficient, a new study indicates that suicidal individuals treated for addiction as inpatients are significantly more likely to abstain from alcohol and drugs.

Mark Ilgen and his colleagues at the Veterans Administration Palo Alto Health Care System in California compared outcomes for addiction patients who had and had not reported suicide attempts and who were treated either as outpatients or during an extended hospital stay. All the patients had serious substance abuse problems, such as alcohol or cocaine dependence. Individuals who had reported a recent suicide attempt and were treated in the hospital did significantly better than any of the others: an 88 percent rate of abstinence from drugs six months later, compared with rates of around 60 percent for the rest.

Inpatient protocols—in this case, the average stay was 23 days—are expensive, but Ilgen notes that substance abusers who are suicidal often require several kinds of physical and mental health services again and again. “If this intensive treatment really does help them maintain abstinence over the long term, it would be cost-effective,” he says, reducing the drain they would otherwise impose on the health care system.

SA Mind Vol 16 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Hospital Stay Helps” in SA Mind Vol. 16 No. 4 (), p. 11
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1205-11b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe