New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Hospital Stay Helps

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although outpatient treatment of psychiatric problems can be cost-efficient, a new study indicates that suicidal individuals treated for addiction as inpatients are significantly more likely to abstain from alcohol and drugs.

Mark Ilgen and his colleagues at the Veterans Administration Palo Alto Health Care System in California compared outcomes for addiction patients who had and had not reported suicide attempts and who were treated either as outpatients or during an extended hospital stay. All the patients had serious substance abuse problems, such as alcohol or cocaine dependence. Individuals who had reported a recent suicide attempt and were treated in the hospital did significantly better than any of the others: an 88 percent rate of abstinence from drugs six months later, compared with rates of around 60 percent for the rest.

Inpatient protocols—in this case, the average stay was 23 days—are expensive, but Ilgen notes that substance abusers who are suicidal often require several kinds of physical and mental health services again and again. “If this intensive treatment really does help them maintain abstinence over the long term, it would be cost-effective,” he says, reducing the drain they would otherwise impose on the health care system.

SA Mind Vol 16 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Hospital Stay Helps” in SA Mind Vol. 16 No. 4 (), p. 11
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1205-11b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe