House Call for Defibrillators

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: learncpr.org

Mickey Eisenberg sounds a new controversial suggestion in an editorial in today's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association: Make automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) available for purchase over-the-counter so that people might have them at home. There are now many plans to get these devices out of the ER and into public spaces like gyms, planes, sports arenas and government office buidlings. But AEDs in public spaces, Eisenberg argues, would help only about 16 percent of the annual cardiac arrest cases in the U.S.

In contrast, as many as 75 percent of people who die suddenly of heart disease--the leading cause of death among U.S. adults--do so at home. Were defibrillators and trained family members at hand, the editorial suggests, many might be saved. "CPR has become a lay procedure--anybody can learn it, and it is assumed that bystanders will use it in emergency situations," says Eisenberg, who created a site for teaching CPR (right). "Similarly, there is growing awareness that defibrillation is moving into the community."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Current obstacles to Eisenberg's dream of home defibrillation are not insignificant. For one thing, the devices are expensive, starting at about $3,000. Also, the Food and Drug Administration must first be convinced that--with sufficient labeling and instruction--the devices are safe and efficient. But for Eisenberg, who has received funding from defibrillator manufacturers, the campaign is not new. See his article in the June 1998 issue of Scientific American.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe