How are the abbreviations on the periodic table of elements determined?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Michael R. Topp, professor of chemistry at the University of Pennsylvania, explains.

Although some of the symbols on the periodic table may seem strange, they all make sense with a little background information. For example, the symbol for the element mercury, Hg, comes from the Latin word hydrargyrum, meaning "liquid silver," a more recent version of which was the English "quicksilver." Many other elements that were known to the ancients also have names derived from Latin. The table below lists some examples for which the initials do not correspond with their modern English names.

The rare (or inert) gases were discovered much more recently and tend to have classical-sounding names based on Greek. For example, xenon means "the stranger" in Greek and argon means "inert." Helium is named after the sun.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So far, 110 elements have been formally named. Newly discovered ones have names determined jointly by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP), which gives discoverers the chance to name them. All of these "new" elements are synthetic and the discovery of each needs confirmation. An abstract published by IUPAC gives insights into the procedure: "A joint IUPAC-IUPAP Working Party confirmed the discovery of the element with atomic number 110. In accord with IUPAC procedures, the discoverers proposed a name and symbol for the element. The Inorganic Chemistry Division recommended this proposal for acceptance, and it was adopted by the IUPAC Council at Ottawa, 16 August 2003. The recommended name is darmstadtium with symbol Ds."


The proposal to name element 111 Roentgenium, symbol Rg, has been recommended for approval by the Inorganic Chemistry Division Committee of IUPAC. As they state: "This proposal lies within the long-established tradition of naming elements to honor famous scientists. Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen discovered x-rays in 1895."

For informational purposes, as yet undiscovered elements having higher atomic numbers are assigned so-called placeholder names, which are simply Latinized versions of their atomic numbers. Thus element 111 was formerly designated unununium, literally "one one one," (symbol "Uuu") and element 112, which is still formally unnamed, has been given the temporary name of ununbium (symbol "Uub").

[Editor's note: The name roentgenium for the element of atomic number 111 (with symbol Rg) was officially approved as of November 1, 2004.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe