How Can Galaxies Move Faster Than the Speed of Light? [Video]

Charles Liu, astrophysicist at the American Museum of Natural History, answers questions submitted to our YouTube Space Lab Channel

By Eric R. Olson

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Questions answered in this episode:

"If I'm near the speed of light, and someone else comes against me near the speed of light too, will we be nearly twice the speed of light relative to each other.? Would we be moving so fast in different directions that the time to reach to each other would be distorted to compensate for the speed?" - Bruno Portel "Lets suppose an object is moving faster than the speed of light. If an individual was looking at this object whiz by in space, would the light coming off the object (and hitting your eyes) be trailing behind the object's actual position in space? In other words, would the object appear to be moving at the speed of light, even though it is going faster?"- Dylan Thompson "How is it that the galaxies moving away from each other will eventually surpass light speed? (or How is it possible for galaxies to travel faster than light, but still comply to the theory of general relativity?)" - despratename

Submit your questions for the next round of Ask the Experts by clicking here and posting in the YouTube comments (Google account required). And while you're there be sure to subscribe to our Spacelab channel for weekly videos on space and astronomy.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The question with the most "likes" will be answered in the next video by a new guest expert. Previous episodes have featured astronomer Caleb Scharf, physicist Lawrence Krauss and Scientific American's own editor in chief, Mariette DiChristina.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American