New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How Can Science Help Reverse Blindness?

From bionic eyes to gene editing, how can we use science to bring back sight?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


The human eye is an incredibly complex organ, and researchers continue to actively investigate how the eye functions and, in some cases, why it does not. An estimated 36 million people worldwide are blind, and an additional 217 million people have moderate to severe impairment of their vision. How many of these cases are avoidable? How can science help us reverse visual impairment and even blindness?

Reversing Blindness with Gene Editing


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The most common genetic condition affecting vision is known as retinitis pigmentosa. Globally, around 1.5 million children are born with retinitis pigmentosa, a condition which causes the cells on the retina to deteriorate over time. This usually starts with a loss of night vision, followed by tunnel vision, and eventually can end in blindness.

Since retinitis pigmentosa is a genetic condition, it is caused by a genetic mutation. If cells from a healthy retina can be inserted into the eye, they could dominate over the cells with the mutation to either slow or stop the retinal degeneration. However, using cells from someone else’s healthy retina runs the risk of the foreign cells not being accepted by the new host body. Fortunately, new approaches to gene editing like the CRISPR/Cas9 enzyme mean that we can snip out unwanted sections of our own genes.

In a recent study published in the journal Nature, researchers took skin cells from patients with retinitis pigmentosa and used a known technique for turning them into multipurpose cells (called pluripotent stem cells). They then removed the mutation through CRISPR gene editing. When they tested the cells 10 days later, the mutation was still gone. The next steps will be to test whether the cells can be put back into the afflicted retina with positive results.

Researchers are also looking at reprogramming the eye’s own cells to address congenital issues like retinitis pigmentosa and other degenerative diseases like age-related macular degeneration. For example, scientists from the National Eye Institute (part of the National Institutes of Health in the U.S.) recently found that Muller glia, cells that act as connective support between neurons in the eye—or, in other words, retinal glue—could be reprogrammed to function as photoreceptors in the eyes of mice that were born blind, specifically the rods that allow us to see in low light.

»Continue reading “How Can Science Help Reverse Blindness?” on QuickAndDirtyTips.com

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe