New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How Can the World Prepare for the Next Pandemic?

The COVID pandemic is not over, but countries must start to prepare for the next one to avoid a similar or even worse outcome

Coronavirus

Sam Falconer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The COVID-19 pandemic is not over, and already its cost is staggering. The disease could have contributed to around 17 million deaths. And, by 2024, the hit to the global economy could reach US$12.5 trillion. Everyone has experienced an extraordinary few years that few people would want to repeat. If the world is to avoid a similar or worse event in the future, countries must ensure that they are better prepared to deal with pandemics.

The response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus is far from perfect. High points, such as the speed at which effective vaccines were developed, contrast with low points, such as the unequal distribution of those vaccines around the world. The pandemic can teach us many valuable lessons that, if acted on, will put the world in a much better position to respond to future threats.

Many eyes are on viruses that jump from animals to people’most pandemics in recent decades have emerged in this way. Machine learning could help to predict what the next pandemic-causing pathogen will be, or where it might first infect people. Climate modelling could also inform plans for infectious-disease outbreaks.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Such work will at most reduce the frequency of pandemics. When an outbreak inevitably strikes, health-care professionals must have the tools and training to spot it and take action to limit its spread. Delaying transmission is crucial to fighting infectious diseases, which, as history tells us, are very difficult to eradicate after they have gone global. Some strategies that could help to achieve this can operate in the background – far-ultraviolet lamps, for instance, could disinfect the air in public spaces. But many others require public buy-in, and the sometimes confused messaging around COVID-19 revealed weaknesses in how public-health authorities communicate health advice.

Researchers have laid a path to better pandemic preparedness. Leaders of governments and industry must now follow it.

We are pleased to acknowledge the funding provided by a grant from AstraZeneca and the financial support of Moderna in producing this Outlook. As always, Nature retains sole responsibility for all editorial content.

This article is part of Nature Outlook: Pandemic Preparedness, an editorially independent supplement produced with the financial support of third parties. About this content.

Richard Hodson is senior supplements editor for Nature.

More by Richard Hodson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 327 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Pandemic Preparedness” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 327 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican122022-5Rndjj23F5bzhoATMvIJ26

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe