How do scientists detect new elements (such as element-118) if they only last milliseconds before disintegrating?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Todd M. Hamilton, an associate professor and chair of the department of chemistry at Adrian College, explains.

Nuclear scientists continue to expand the periodic table as they detect new elements. These novel elements, such as the recently discovered 118, pose a challenge to researchers because they are so fleeting.

When a heavy element disintegrates, or decays, it gives off a radiation signature that can be used to prove that it existed. The three main types of radiation emitted are alpha particles (which are essentially helium nuclei), beta particles (including electrons and the electron anti-particles called positrons) and gamma rays (which are high-energy photons). Radiation given off by an element's decay is unique and some of the decays produce alpha particles of distinct energy. As a rule of thumb, the heavier the atom and the higher the atomic number--the number of protons in the nucleus--the more energetic the alpha particle given off by its decay will be. For example, the isotope radium 226 (one of the lightest alpha emitters, with atomic number 88) emits an alpha particle of 4.78 million electron volts (MeV), whereas element-110 emits an alpha particle with about 11 MeV.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists create heavy elements by bombarding two lighter elements that together add up to the mass of the desired new element. One of the elements is stationary and thus called the target. The other, called the projectile, is accelerated in a cyclotron or other type of particle accelerator and effectively shot into the first element. A tiny fraction of the time the two elements ¿stick¿ together and form the new element, which then quickly decays. Sometimes it takes millions of collisions and several weeks of bombardment to create one atom of the new element. Specially positioned particle detectors interfaced to elaborate computer systems record the decays for later analysis.

In addition to using the unique energies of the alpha particles emitted to identify new elements, heavy-element hunters also use a cascade of alpha emissions to confirm their existence. Each alpha decay lowers the atomic number by two. For example, evidence for element-114 consisted of a chain of alpha particles that were all detected at the same location in the detector within a given time range. They signaled the decay of element-114 289 (the isotope with 114 protons and 175 neutrons, giving it a mass number of 289) first to element-112 (mass number 285), then element-110 (mass number 281) and finally element-108 with a mass number of 277. Putting all of this information together is tricky business, but it can serve as convincing evidence that an element that no longer exists was, in fact, created.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe