New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How Early Mammals Evolved for Success

A preview by our editor in chief of the June 2016 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Talk about humble beginnings. Most of our notions about our mammal ancestors portray them as shrewlike critters barely eking out an existence in the shadow of dinosaurs for millions of years. When the hulking giants got felled in the aftermath of environmental changes from a giant meteor impact, the pathetic warm-blooded runts finally got to make their move, eventually blossoming into the wide diversity of successful species we see today, including humans.

Not so fast. As paleontologists Stephen Brusatte and Zhe-Xi Luo write in this issue's cover story, “Ascent of the Mammals,” a series of spectacular recent fossil discoveries reveal surprising twists on the old tales you learned in your schoolbooks. Millions of years before it was ever thought possible, evolution began to lay the groundwork for mammals to become the world's dominant vertebrate species.

The tiny animals developed an array of specializations and evolutionary innovations, making them adept at taking advantage of a variety of ecosystem niches. Their tooth shapes enabled the processing of new foods, and their growth patterns enhanced survival of their young. Early mammals came to climb, to glide, to swim. Ultimately, as we know, they crawled all over this blue planet. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Delve Deeper

The process of science has many admirable traits, and one of them is how it builds on prior knowledge—which is ideally freely shared. For that reason, a little over a year ago Scientific American's parent company began an experiment of its own: through the use of software from ReadCube, supported by the company Digital Science, it enabled readers of this magazine and about 100 other mass-market publications free access to view original research papers published in close to 50 journals, including Nature. Readers who clicked on links placed in articles at ScientificAmerican.com and elsewhere could follow their curiosity, delving deeper into the methods and results of published findings. Each paper received an average of 200 more views during the 15-month trial.

Now I'm delighted to report that such content sharing is extended to the entire Springer Nature portfolio, covering more than 2,700 journals and 300,000 new articles a year. That means there's a whole new world of science freely available, just for you.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 6This article was published with the title “A Success Story” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 6 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0616-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe