New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How Good Is Star Trek's Record at Predicting the Future of Tech?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In this month’s Scientific American column, I wrote about Hollywood’s depiction of personal technology in the future. Lots of it is pure wishful-thinking silliness. But sometimes, you can sense the thought that’s been put into these props, and inventors eventually create them for use in the real world.

“Star Trek,” of course, was one of the most influential sci-fi shows of all time. Even the technologies of the original series, which ran on TV from 1966 to 1969, have inspired all kinds of inventions that have become commonplace in the real world. How many? Let’s have a look at the “Star Trek” Prediction Scorecard.

  • Bluetooth earpieces. There it was, stuck into Uhura’s ear: The original Bluetooth wireless earpiece, looking and working just as they do today.

  • Hello, computer. What are Siri, Cortana, and “OK Google,” if not the kind of call-and-response computer that Captain Kirk routinely queried?

  • Communicators. In “Star Trek’s” day, phones were wired to the wall; the first cellphone prototype was still eight years away. Eventually, of course, our calls went wireless. And for about 30 years, the flip phone—a close lookalike of the Enterprise’s communicator—is what “phones” looked like.

  • Universal translators. How do you think the Enterprise crew was able to converse with aliens speaking their own wacky languages? Using a Translator, of course. Now, products like Google’s Pixel Buds and Skype Translator purport to do the same thing: To translate a language someone is speaking into your own language, directly into your ear.

  • Sliding doors. Yep. They’re everywhere now, primarily at entrances to buildings you enter with your arms full, like airports and grocery stores.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Star Trek: The Next Generation” (1987–1994) scored some bullseyes, too, including the tablet computer and the Holodeck, whose creation of virtual worlds around you is precisely what our virtual-reality goggles attempt to do today.

Then there’s the show’s depiction of racial harmony, well-meaning space exploration, and teleporters. On those developments, we’re still waiting.

David Pogue is the anchor columnist for Yahoo Tech and host of several NOVA miniseries on PBS.

More by David Pogue
Scientific American Magazine Vol 318 Issue 1This article was published with the title “How Good Is Star Trek's Record at Predicting the Future of Tech?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 318 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012018-5QAIzU7Y9m5hhDFDhumdwi

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe