New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How Humanity Can Earn the Respect of Extraterrestrials

Favoring science over war would demonstrate our suitability to join a galactic club of civilizations

A man stands in front of an enormous device festooned with electronics.

A detector at the Large Hadron Collider.

In a recent Q&A forum about my book Extraterrestrial, I confessed that I search for signs of intelligent civilizations in the sky since I can’t seem to find any on Earth. An audience member chuckled and asked: “How do you define an intelligent civilization?”

In my book, an intelligent culture is characterized by the trademarks of science, namely: promoting a prosperous future through cooperation and sharing of evidence-based knowledge. Daily news reports indicate that humans do not follow these principles very often. We tend to fight with each other, favor prejudice over evidence, and seek ways to feel superior relative to other people.  The last tendency is the source of all evil throughout human history, as it results in phenomena such as elitism, supremacism, nationalism, racism, antisemitism, genocide and wars.

And speaking about the harm caused by wars: in 1939, Winston Churchill wrote an essay on the exciting prospects of the search for alien life—but had no time to publish it because he was asked to serve as the prime minister of the United Kingdom in its fight against the Nazi regime. Driven by Hitler’s racism and antisemitism, the Second World War cost four trillion dollars for the U.S. alone and 75 million human lives—about 3 percent of the world population at that time. The human loss included a genocide of six million Jews—about two thirds of Europe’s Jewish population. My grandfather’s family resided for seven centuries in Germany prior to the war, and all that remains now is a street named after him—the Albert-Loeb-Weg in his birth town.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If the lost resources and lives were dedicated to Churchill’s original vision instead of being wrongfully wasted, we could have known by now whether there are smarter kids on our cosmic block. This alternate history would have signaled intelligence at our end and could have cemented Churchill’s legacy as a thought leader rather than a political leader. But instead, an alien species watching us during World War II would have concluded that we have a long way to go before gaining galactic-scale respect as an intelligent species.

The opposite of war is cooperation, best exemplified by the scientific culture. When embarking on a trip anywhere around the globe as a practicing scientist, I have the privilege of meeting numerous other scientists with common interests. Sharing knowledge makes science an infinite-sum game, out of which everyone benefits through cooperation. If medical records in China were shared more openly during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines could have been developed earlier, saving more human lives. Science offers a global solution to our global problems through cooperation on the one planet that we all share.

The remarkable success of science and technology in developing the COVID-19 vaccines is not celebrated enough. Currently, more than 99 percent of all COVID-19 hospitalizations in the U.S. involve patients who were not fully vaccinated. This fact alone underscores the triumph of medical science and technology in shielding us from the pandemic. The effective messenger RNA vaccine did not follow the traditional approach of using a weakened virus but rather employed a synthetic chemical to achieve the needed immune response.

The application of scientific knowledge to a practical use, as in the case of the COVID-19 vaccines, often stems from many years of blue-sky research, which aims to merely garner a better understanding of the fundamental principles. Another important essay written in 1939 was by Abraham Flexner, the founding director of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, who helped bring to the United States many Jewish scientists from Europe who would have suffered persecution by the rising Nazi government—including the institute’s very first professor, Albert Einstein. As a result of its turn to fascism, Germany lost its world leadership in science.

Flexner’s essay, “The Usefulness of Useless Knowledge,” describes how curiosity-driven research with no concern for applications leads to some of the most revolutionary technological breakthroughs. The time lag between scientific discoveries and their practical use can be long. When Einstein developed the general theory of relativity in 1915, he thought mostly about its application to the solar system (precession of Mercury and deflection of starlight by the sun) and the cosmos, but never imagined its crucial role in enabling the precision required for global positioning systems a century later. Similarly, the originators of quantum mechanics did not imagine its numerous applications in electronic devices and computers.

Science is the torch that will continue to light our path as we move forward through the darkness. We can get a glimpse at our future by finding technological signatures of extraterrestrial civilizations that had more time to develop their science simply because their host stars formed before the sun. This search for both biological signatures of microbial life and technological signatures of intelligent life is thoroughly reviewed in a new textbook that I wrote in collaboration with my former postdoc Manasvi Lingam, Life In the Cosmos, to be published by Harvard University Press on June 29. If Churchill were alive, I would have sent him a gift copy of this textbook with a dedicated inscription—in gratitude for his 1939 foresight.

Here’s hoping for a better future of humanity, guided by science and not conflict. The scientific knowledge that distant extraterrestrial intelligences exist might seem useless at first glance, but it could have the major practical benefit of motivating our civilization to get its act together and avoid wars, as envisioned in then-President Ronald Reagan’s 1987 address to the United Nations. If we follow the scientific principles of cooperation in pursuit of evidence-based knowledge, we will demonstrate to alien civilizations that there is an intelligent species on Earth worthy of their attention. Perhaps then it will become clear why they had been ignoring us for so long. Fermi’s paradox will be resolved by an acknowledgement on their side that our actions are finally intelligent. A wiser behavior at our end might earn us an honorable place in the club of intelligent galactic civilizations for the first time in human history.

This is an opinion and analysis article; the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, founding director of Harvard University’s Black Hole Initiative, and the former chair of the Harvard astronomy department (2011-2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He has published more than a thousand peer-reviewed papers and is the bestselling author of Extraterrestrial and Interstellar and a co-author of the textbooks Life in the Cosmos and The First Galaxies in the Universe.

More by Avi Loeb

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe