How Lizards Get Their Spots

Each scale on an ocellated lizard coordinates its color with its neighbors

The convoluted pattern on the backs of ocellated lizards is the result of a highly coordinated effort between skin cells.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As adults, ocellated lizards (Timon lepidus) sport a convoluted pattern of black and green on their backs. Colour patterns aren’t rare in animals, but the ocellated lizard develops its labyrinthine palette in an unusual way.

Researchers found that some scales on the lizard’s back change colour during the transformation from juvenile to adult after detecting the colour of neighbouring scales. The team described these scales as decision-making units in a study published on April 12 in Nature.

A set of mathematical rules called Turing equations describes how many animals, including lizards, develop stripes or spots. The resulting 'Turing patterns' are continuous across the organism and are determined independently of other biological features, such as lizard scales. But the backs of adult ocellated lizards have a discrete pattern that is linked to individual scales. (The scales on this species are made of clear keratin, so the colours of the underlying skin shine through: each is either black or green.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“That’s what makes the paper exciting,” says systems biologist James Sharpe of the Centre for Genomic Regulation in Barcelona, Spain. “Biology tends to be rather flexible and squishy, and this is digital and discrete.”

Self-determination

To investigate this phenomenon, Michel Milinkovitch, a biophysicist at the University of Geneva in Switzerland, and his colleagues took high-resolution photographs of the backs of three male lizards. The researchers began when the animals were two weeks old and continued until the lizards were three or four years old. The team used the images to track the fates of about 5,000 hexagonal scales across the back of each reptile.

As each lizard aged, the overall pattern on their backs went from brown with white spots to a convoluted pattern of green and black. Roughly 1,500 scales changed colour, such that green scales had four black and two green neighbours, whereas black scales had three black and three green neighbours. This ‘mind the neighbours’ behaviour reminded Milinkovitch of a process called a cellular automaton.

Cellular automatons, first described in terms of computer science, are self-replicating units that perform calculations. In ocellated lizards, this means that an individual scale sums up information from the ones around it—how many are black and how many are green—and makes a decision about its own colour.

“We could have stopped there,” says Milinkovitch. But he wondered why the lizards don’t follow the Turing-pattern rules that govern the markings on most other animals.

Connecting the dots

To find out, the team focused on the lizards’ skin cells. Lizards and fish have skin composed of various cell types that generate different colours. And researchers know that zebrafish skin cells, for example, interact with each other to establish Turing patterns.

Milinkovitch and his team modelled the interactions between colour cells on the basis of equations derived from zebrafish data and compared their results to the patterns on the lizards’ skin. They found that ocellated lizard skin is thick under each scale, which provides room for cells to interact. But between scales, the skin is thin, with less room for cells to connect. The decreased thickness limits the colour to within individual scales on the lizards’ back. This suggests that animal skin bumpiness can disrupt a continuous Turing pattern.

Researchers have shown that cellular automata can create larger Turing patterns, such as those seen on seashells, says Milinkovitch. But the latest study describes the first time that scientists have observed the opposite: small Turing patterns that feed into large cellular automata.

The development of colour patterns in animals is usually described qualitatively, says Devi Stuart-Fox, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Melbourne in Australia. The ocellated lizard’s patterning probably helps the animal to blend into its environment. “But when you can show that there are general mathematical principles that can describe biological processes,” she says, “it provides a nice conceptual framework to understand what’s happening.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on April 12, 2017.

Sarah McQuate is a journalist in the Science Communication Program at the University of California, Santa Cruz. She holds a doctorate degree in biochemistry from University of Colorado Boulder. Sarah is passionate about making the complexities of science accessible to everyone and she loves showing off how beautiful science can be. To see what Sarah is currently writing about, check out her website or follow her on Twitter.

More by Sarah McQuate

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe