New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How Monarchs Make Their Way to Mexico

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Each year, as winter frosts and frigid air begin to envelop the northeastern U.S. and eastern Canada, monarch butterflies summering in these regions set out on a 3,500-kilometer journey to the mountains of central Mexico. Precisely how the insects find their way to this refuge has long eluded biologists. But new findings may help unravel the mystery. According to a report published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the creatures appear to navigate using the sun.

Previous work hinted that the sun and the earth¿s magnetic field might guide the monarch¿s migration. But few of those studies examined the butterfly¿s ability to navigate in a controlled setting, relying instead on observations of the animals in the wild. In the new work, Henrik Mouritsen and Barrie Frost of Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, started by creating a butterfly flight simulator. They tethered the insects in clear Plexiglas cylinders, blowing light air from the tube's bottom to stimulate flight. Then, to assess whether the monarch triangulates the sun's position using its internal clock to determine which direction is southwest--the way to Mexico-- the researchers reset some of the butterflies¿ circadian rhythms by 6 hours in either direction of the actual time. Butterflies whose rhythms had not been changed consistently flew in a southwesterly direction when put outside on sunny days, even though the researchers often forced them to change course throughout the experiment. Insects with altered cycles, however, headed either southeast or northwest, depending on their perceived time and where the sun would be at that hour¿that is, because their clocks were shifted, these monarchs miscalculated the actual position of the sun and flew in the wrong direction. Additionally, when the researchers simulated overcast conditions in the lab, the monarchs flew about randomly. Even after introducing strong magnetic fields, the butterflies did not head in any particular direction.

"The clear and predicted directional shifts produced by clock-shifting the butterflies provide strong evidence that migratory monarchs use a time-compensated sun compass," the authors conclude. "These experiments do not provide any evidence that monarch butterflies use a magnetic compass during migration."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe