How Old Is Your Cancer?

Pancreatic tumors can germinate for a decade before turning deadly, raising hopes for early detection

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A patient who receives a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer has only a 5 percent chance of surviving for five years, a harrowing prognosis that scientists have long struggled to understand. Part of the problem, new research suggests, is that the disease is not typically diagnosed until 15 years after the first cancer-causing mutations appear, by which point the cancer has spread and become highly aggressive. The findings indicate that there may be plenty of time for doctors to intervene before pancreatic cancer becomes lethal—an exciting prospect given recent advances in diagnosing the disease early, when it can be successfully removed with surgery and chemotherapy.

In research published recently in Nature (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group), scientists at Johns Hopkins University sequenced the genomes of seven people who had died of late-stage pancreatic cancer. Their tumor cells contained different types of mutations that the scientists traced back in evolutionary time using mathematical models to build a kind of “family mutational tree.” The models suggested that cancer cells appear 10 years after the first cancer-causing mutation arises and that another five years pass before the cancer cells spread and become deadly. The findings question “the pervasive belief that pancreatic cancer is so aggressive and grows so quickly that screening cannot be effectively used,” says study co-author and Johns Hopkins pathologist and oncologist Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue.

In the past two years scientists have brought screening techniques for pancreatic cancer closer to reality. In February 2010 researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, compared RNA found in the saliva of 60 treatable pancreatic cancer patients with the saliva of 30 cancer-free individuals and identified four RNAs that together could correctly identify the cancer 90 percent of the time. And in March 2009 Northwestern University researchers publishing in the journal Disease Markers developed an optical technology that recognizes various stages of pancreatic cancer cells with 95 percent sensitivity. The technique uses light scattering to detect changes in the cells of the duodenum, part of the small intestine adjacent to the pancreas, which can be viewed using minimally invasive endoscopy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


These technologies are not yet available commercially, but early detection using optical tests and blood or saliva analyses should “advance measurably in the next decade,” says David Tuveson, an oncologist at the Cambridge Research Institute in England. Until then, he notes, doctors should consider using current techniques such as CT and MRI scans to screen patients who are at high risk because of family history of the disease. “Recall that our Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had a small pancreatic cancer diagnosed in January 2009 when she was undergoing a CT scan,” Tuveson says. One month later doctors removed it successfully and discharged her with a clean bill of health.

Melinda Wenner Moyer, a contributing editor at Scientific American, is author of Hello, Cruel World! Science-Based Strategies for Raising Terrific Kids in Terrifying Times (G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 2025).

More by Melinda Wenner Moyer
Scientific American Magazine Vol 304 Issue 1This article was published with the title “How Old Is Your Cancer?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 304 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012011-2W9fSDTLD9O6RU3GvRD6FA

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe