How Online Subscription Services Deal with the Problem of Password Sharing

In principle, you could share your password with anyone

Jay Bendt

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Decades ago a “subscription” generally referred to magazines or newspapers. Once you'd paid, the publisher didn't care how many times you read each article. You were even welcome to share an issue with family and friends. After all, a physical magazine has a built-in piracy limit: the number of people who can crowd around the pages simultaneously.

Digital subscriptions, though, are quite different. Companies care a lot about who uses them and how many are doing so at once. And no wonder: A digital subscription is really just a username and password. Without some software restrictions by Netflix, you could, in theory, share your password with everyone you know. And pretty soon Netflix would go out of business.

All right, so unlimited password sharing is unworkable. The question, though, is, What's the right approach to preventing it?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The world is still trying to figure that out.

Netflix introduced streaming movies in 2007. No more waiting for a DVD in the mail! Instead—get this—you paid for your movie watching by the hour. You could pay $6 a month to watch six hours of movies, $18 to watch 18 hours, and so on.

Until that moment, humanity had always paid for movies by the movie—in the theater, on DVD or on pay-per-view. Netflix introduced a concept we now take for granted: movie surfing. Start a movie; if it doesn't grab you, start a different one. No big whoop.

Eventually Netflix adopted a flat fee for unlimited streaming movies, and the world was changed forever.

I fly a lot, so I pay $60 a month for unlimited Gogo, an in-flight Wi-Fi service. On a recent flight, though, I couldn't sign on. A message told me that there was some account problem. (It wasn't a total loss: I got to reacquaint myself with the wonderful world of in-flight magazines and safety cards.)

My daughter had used my account on a flight she had taken a week earlier (with my okay), and it turns out that's a Gogo no-no. “Customers are not allowed to share their Gogo account with anyone,” a rep told me—even if they're not using it simultaneously.

Wow. What powers Gogo, anyway—unicorn tears?

The New York Times's policy is similarly stern. “You are not allowed to share your registration login credentials,” its terms of service say. Violate that rule, and “we may refer you to appropriate law enforcement agencies.”

Contrast those approaches with services such as Netflix, Hulu and Spotify: Your monthly fee allows a specified number of simultaneous streams, such as two or four. The companies don't have to sweat over how many people have your password. All they care is that only two of you are watching or listening simultaneously.

The genius of that system is that it leaves enforcement up to us. We yell at our kids to get off Netflix when we, the parents, are trying to watch something. The customers do the antipiracy work.

Maybe such services can afford those friendlier guidelines because they have technical ways to enforce them. If you're paying for two simultaneous Netflix watchers, a third one can't tune in. Sites such as that of the Times, on the other hand, must rely on the honor system. (Well, the honor system and the threaten system.)

The password-sharing conversation must have been very brief at MoviePass, which is like Netflix for the cineplex. For $10 a month, you can see all the movies you want in theaters. What's to stop you from lending out your “login”? A plastic MoviePass card.

The world has gone subscription mad. Everyone says we're in a new golden age of TV series—but to see them, you'll have to subscribe to Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, HBO Go, CBS All Access, and on and on. Add that to your Spotify or Apple Music subscription, your one for Photoshop or Microsoft Office, your antivirus subscription and the identity-theft plan that we may all need soon.

There's still no single standard for metering all this stuff. Here's to the ongoing experiments—and to the industry finding the right balance between convenience and profit.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe