New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How President Biden Can Deliver on His Vaccine Promise to Communities of Color

It will require the federal government to use a scientific, data-driven system for identifying those most in need

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

President Biden’s promise to ensure that communities of color are not left behind in the vaccine rollout shows that he is ready to tackle the pervasive inequities of health care laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic. But turning that promise into practice is not just a case of establishing more vaccination sites. We first need to know where those at high risk within underserved communities are located in order to set up mobile vaccination sites in the right places, and that will require the federal government to use a scientific, data-driven system for identifying those most in need.

The current process for identifying such individuals needs to be fine-tuned. It relies on the CDC’s Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), which was originally developed to help FEMA deliver aid to communities most in need in the aftermath of natural disasters. SVI takes into account census data on some important variables that correspond to individual health, such as housing density and status of employment. But it does not consider other critical risk factors associated with COVID-19 such as access to fresh food, air quality and access to public transportation in a given neighborhood.

A better measure of social vulnerability would be Social Determinants of Health (SDOH), which are the conditions in the environments where people live that directly impact their health. As opposed to SVI, SDOH does consider access to fresh food, air quality and access to public transportation, and therefore provides a more precise picture of the underlying factors that can contribute to vulnerability when people are exposed to the virus. Public health officials need SDOH attributes at a household level so that no one slips through the cracks.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But even SDOH is not, in and of itself, enough—as it does not consider clinical risk factors such as chronic illness, which is a recipe for overlooking minority communities. That’s because conditions like obesity, diabetes and hypertension—all major risk factors for bad outcomes with the virus—are more prevalent in these communities. Consider the fact that sickle cell disease (SCD), an inherited blood cell disorder most common among African Americans, is correlated with death rates from COVID-19 that are three to four times higher than those seen in the general population. We need a system that puts these people at the front of the vaccination queue.

It’s true that factoring in clinical data along with social determinants presents a logistical challenge for the government, but that’s not a reason to skip this vital step. Government can partner with major health insurers and local community providers, which have the best view of their members’ clinical history and knowledge of local vulnerable communities. Health insurers can help public health officials fill in the blanks left by SVI and SDOH in order to identify individuals at highest risk of ending up in an ICU bed or worse when exposed to the virus. 

I know firsthand that health insurers are ready, willing and able to help. As the vaccines were going through approval, my company completed a project for the Department of Health and Human Services where we worked with Blue Shield of California to identify the insurer’s most vulnerable members in the state and optimal pathways to reach them (e.g., pharmacies or primary care providers) once the vaccines were available.

Only when we have a precise risk assessment tool that weighs SDOH and clinical data can we determine exactly where additional doses and mobile vaccination sites are needed. And even then, we cannot simply trust that those most at risk will show up. We need to develop channels of communication that can help engage those most at risk in underserved communities by leveraging trusted community partners­—such as religious groups and social service agencies—to help drive awareness of the importance of getting vaccinated. And for workers with two or more jobs, we need to bring vaccinations to their workplace.

The president has taken a critical first step by prioritizing vaccine access for communities of color. The necessary next step is to unlock the power of science and data to surgically identify individuals in communities of color who are most at risk and ensure the vaccine reaches them first.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe