How Research on Working Memory Can Improve Your Romantic Relationship

A cognitive factor helps explain how well we understand each other

Disagreements are virtually inevitable in a romantic relationship. More than 90 percent of couples argue, according to a survey by the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research, with nearly half quarreling at least once a month. Common topics of marital disagreement are money, sex and time spent together. None of this will surprise anyone who has been in a long-term relationship.

But a new study indicates that a cognitive ability may help to explain why some couples are more successful in resolving their differences. University of North Carolina Greensboro psychologist Levi Baker and his colleagues report that spouses who were high in working memory capacity had better memory for each other’s statements in discussions about problems. In turn, these couples showed greater progress in resolving their problems over time. The study suggests that it’s not just dogged commitment that gets couples through rough spots, but a cognitive factor that directly affects the quality of partners’ communication with each other.         

The sample included 101 couples (93 heterosexual, 7 lesbian and 1 gay) that had been married for less than three months. Working individually, the newlyweds first completed tests of working memory capacity, which is the ability to hold information in the focus of attention over a short period, as when following what someone is saying to you in a conversation. In one of the tests used by Baker and his colleagues, called “operation span,” the test-taker sees an arithmetic problem on the screen and attempts to solve it, after which a letter appears. After some number of these trials, the person is prompted to recall the letters in the order in which they were presented.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Next, the couples participated jointly in problem-solving discussions. Each spouse identified a problem that could be resolved through changes in their partner’s behavior. The couples were then left alone to discuss the problems, spending eight minutes on each and rating the severity of the problem before and after discussing it. After each discussion, the spouses went to separate rooms and were recorded attempting to recall each other’s statements. Finally, after four and eight months, the couples were emailed questionnaires that asked them to again rate the severity of the problems.         

Couples high in working memory capacity showed the greatest decline in problem severity at the follow-ups. Furthermore, spouses high in working memory capacity were the most accurate in recalling each other’s statements from the discussions. Linking these two findings, when the researchers statistically controlled for spouses’ memory for each other’s statements, the relation between working-memory capacity and decline in problem severity dropped significantly.

Baker and his colleagues tested for the influence of other factors on their results, including self-control, tolerance for distress and emotional regulation. None of these factors explained the relation between working memory capacity and decline in problem severity. While noting that other cognitive factors such as reasoning ability could also play a role in marital dispute resolution, the researchers suggested that a high level of working memory capacity contributed to decline in problem severity by facilitating encoding of the problem discussions into long-term memory.

These findings suggest that one way that romantic partners might better resolve their disputes is simply to pay better attention to each other when discussing problems. You have probably had the experience of being introduced to a person and not being able to remember their name seconds later. You didn’t forget the person’s name—you never committed it to memory. That is, you didn’t pay enough attention to it to transfer it into your long-term memory. In the same way, if you don’t attend to what your partner is saying when discussing a problem, you will remember it poorly, if at all. Making matters worse, in the absence of an accurate memory for the conversation, you may remember what you think your partner said rather than what they actually said, leading to a false memory. So listen carefully to your lover, and save discussions about relationship problems for times when the two of you are most attentive: when you are rested, sober and undistracted.

Conflict will always be a part of romantic relationships. Insights gained from this new research on the cognitive underpinnings of dispute resolution, however, may help partners resolve their differences more effectively and spend more time on the things that make a relationship worth having in the first place.

Are you a scientist who specializes in neuroscience, cognitive science, or psychology? And have you read a recent peer-reviewed paper that you would like to write about? Please send suggestions to Mind Matters editor Gareth Cook. Gareth, a Pulitzer prize-winning journalist, is the series editor of Best American Infographics and can be reached at garethideas AT gmail.com or Twitter 

@garethideas.

David Z. Hambrick is a professor in the cognition and cognitive neuroscience area of the department of psychology at Michigan State University. His research focuses on the origins and underpinnings of expertise and skill.

More by David Z. Hambrick

Daisuke S. Katsumata is a graduate student in the cognition and cognitive neuroscience program at MSU. He is interested in the origins of elite performance, particularly in e-sports.

More by Daisuke S. Katsumata
SA Mind Vol 31 Issue 1This article was published with the title “How Research on Working Memory Can Improve Your Romantic Relationship” in SA Mind Vol. 31 No. 1 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0120-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe