How Some Cancer Cells Cheat Death

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For normal cells, each cycle of division is a step toward death. The process gradually erodes the enzyme caps, or telomeres, that protect the ends of the cell's all-important chromosomes. Cancer cells, however, have figured out a way to cheat death by rebuilding their telomeres. About 90 percent do this by reactivating the gene for an enzyme called telomerase. But the remaining 10 percent achieve immortality without turning on the telomerase gene. Research published today in the online early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences has pinpointed an alternative protein that these cells appear to use. The discovery could lead to new ways to combat cancer.

David Sinclair of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues focused on a gene known as WRN. Its absence in humans causes Werner's syndrome, a rare disease characterized by greatly accelerated aging. They found that the absence of a version of WRN in yeast resulted in cells that did not survive beyond the normal number of cell divisions. In contrast, those yeast cells endowed with the WRN equivalent attained the ability to divide endlessly.

The WRN protein is basically a longevity molecule, Sinclair explains. "Cancer cells may utilize the WRN protein for their own purposes to become immortal and get around the barrier to tumorigenesis and cancer formation." If so, blocking the WRN protein in the 10 percent of cancers that maintain their telomeres without activating the telomerase gene could prove to be an effective way to fight tumors. What's more, that strategy could, in theory, also be applied to the other 90 percent of tumor cells, which when deprived of telomerase sometimes switch to the other telomere maintenance strategy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because WRN plays a critical role in cell life, blocking the protein in all cells as a means of treating cancer might not be a prudent approach. On the other hand, Sinclair notes, considering that Werner's patients don't develop the early aging symptoms until their mid- to late teens, systemic delivery for short periods might be feasible. "What I foresee is either just have a short-term dose of this drug or target it to cells that are cancerous," he remarks. "Of course, getting this drug to cancer cells is the challenge."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe