New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How the wildlife trade boosts the chance of a disease jumping from animals to humans

Decades of data reveal that animals involved in the wildlife trade—from pet sales to meat markets to illegal poaching—are much more likely to carry pathogens that can infect humans

A hand in a blue glove holding a little Brown Myotis bat with its mouth opened.

Some commonly traded animals—such as bats—carry pathogens that can not only be transmitted to humans, but have been known to cause outbreaks.

ZUMA Press, Inc./Alamy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The wildlife trade is expansive. Whether legal or not, it encompasses pet sales, meat markets, furs and even medicine. About 25 percent of mammal species are involved in some part of the trade, and scientists have warned that it may contribute to zoonotic diseases—illnesses that arise from pathogens that jump from animals to humans, as had occurred with the virus that causes COVID. But exactly how and how often these diseases are passed from animals to humans isn’t always clear.

A new study published today in Science reveals a close correlation between species in the wildlife trade and animals that are known to have passed pathogens on to humans.

“There’s a strong link,” says Jérôme Gippet, an ecologist at the University of Fribourg in Switzerland. “What we could calculate is that, for every 10 years that the species is on the wildlife market, it shares one additional pathogen with humans.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers combed through more than 40 years of data tracing which animal species are involved in the legal or illegal wildlife trades. Then they compared this information with a dataset called CLOVER, which lists the pathogens found in different species. The team’s analysis revealed that among 2,079 traded mammal species, 41 percent shared at least one transmissible pathogen with humans. For comparison, just 6.4 percent of nontraded animals shared such a pathogen.

The researchers had expected that humans would be more likely to encounter germs from animals they interacted with closely more often. The study highlights the need for better disease surveillance and outbreak preparation, however, Gippet says.

“Before [the study] my idea of disease transmission risk in wildlife was more like, ‘Oh, there’s some dirty species,’” he says. “But what we show here is: it’s not really about the species; it’s more about the humans.”

Not all zoonotic pathogens that humans encounter lead to outbreaks or pandemics on the scale of COVID. Some don’t harm our species or aren’t capable of human-to-human transmission. Still, any increase in exposure and transmission comes with the risk of a virus or bacterium evolving to become something more concerning.

The study “emphasizes the importance of having much better controls and regulation of the wildlife trade,” says Wayne Getz, an ecologist at the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in the new work.

Preparing for potential disease outbreaks involves increasing global disease surveillance, using predictive models to determine which pathogens should be a research priority and creating action plans for when potential outbreaks are detected. The study authors hope their research inspires more preparation.

“There’s no safe trade,” Gippet says. “Trade, in itself, creates the opportunity for pathogen transmission.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe