How Thin Is the Woman in the Mirror?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Source: Partnership for Healthy Weight Management

Many women know firsthand that the expression "you are as beautiful as you feel" can also apply to weight, as a new study demonstrates. But they may be surprised to learn that other women also often appear only as beautiful or thin as their beholders. Martin Tovee, Joanne Emery and Esther Cohen-Tovee of the University of Newcastle upon Tyne draw this conclusion from interviews with 204 women--a sixth of whom were anorexic; another sixth, bulemic; and the remaining unaffected by an eating disorder. They report their findings in the October 7 issue of the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B.

The scientists asked all of the women to first approximate their own body mass index (BMI), a measure of size that equals a person's weight in kilograms divided by their height in meters squared (see chart). Then they asked them to estimate the BMIs of other women in photographs and, finally, to appraise the attractiveness of these women. Tovee and colleagues discovered that, not surprisingly, the subjects with eating disorders overestimated their own BMI, as well as those of the women in the photos. But they also found that the normal women, too, deemed the women in photos to be heavier for their height than they really were. Overall, the thinner the subject, the fatter she judged the photographed women to be--and the more she found the thinnest women most attractive. The researchers suggest that this trend could in part help explain the origins of eating disorders: as a woman loses more weight, her notion of what is attractive also becomes increasingly slender, creating a dangerous feedback loop.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe