New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

How to Be an Effective Science Communicator

Telescopes on the moon, the mathematics of connections, new hope for dark matter, and realistic mythical beings

Scientific American April 2021

Scientific American April 2021

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In the Before Times, science and health journalists would talk about how much we appreciated our readers but just wished that more people took an interest. In the Pandemic Times, we have to add: but not like this! It's been a scary and exhausting year but also the most educational time in living memory. Hundreds of millions of people now understand concepts such as epidemiological modeling, asymptomatic transmission, herd immunity, phase 3 vaccine trials, and more. Our collective vocabulary has expanded with serious and grimly funny terms like “pandemic fine” (in response to “How are you?”) or “Blursday” (in response to “What day is it?”).

As the pandemic starts to come under control, we at Scientific American are grateful for all the scientists around the world who collaborated at lightning speed on studying the coronavirus and creating vaccines, the health-care workers who developed best practices to treat sick patients while their own lives were in danger, all the experts who talked with reporters to get the right information to the public, and especially to everyone—to all of you—who has helped spread knowledge.

Public policy scholar and communication professor Kathleen Hall Jamieson shares evidence-based, practical advice for how best to do just that. Anyone can be an effective science communicator and support a culture that endorses science by using her pro tips to help friends reject myths about the coronavirus, vaccines, masks, or (is this really the year 2021?) whether Earth is round or flat.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We have a trio of stories this month about how astronomers and physicists are using new technology to understand some of the biggest mysteries in the universe. The far side of our moon could soon be teeming with radio telescopes, orbiters and rovers, as author Anil Ananthaswamy explains. Shielded from Earth's radiation, it's an ideal place to look for signs of the universe's dark ages, the first few hundred million years after the big bang.

Adaptive optics technology gives telescopes a crisper view of distant objects by compensating for turbulence in the atmosphere—it's a way to “untwinkle the stars.” Astronomers Tony Travouillon and Céline d'Orgeville and optical instrumentation expert Francis Bennet share how the technology is now being used to study space debris and could allow clear and secure quantum-encrypted communication.

If any experiment is likely to detect dark matter particles in the coming years, it's a new version of XENON at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy. See the magnificent instruments being set up now, as senior editor Clara Moskowitz describes them.

Mathematics based on simple connection diagrams underlies some of the most complex networks of modern life, including cell-phone networks, viral memes on social media, or even the spread of disease. In our cover story, mathematician Kelsey Houston-Edwards shows the power of “percolation theory.”

Natural gas is the biggest source of electricity in the U.S., and consumption has risen about 30 percent in the past 15 years. It's not going away, but a range of achievable technologies can make it much more climate-friendly, as energy resources expert Michael E. Webber explains.

Our flight of fancy for April takes wing. Paleontologist Michael B. Habib and illustrator Terryl Whitlatch blend biomechanical rules and research on pterosaurs and other extinct creatures to create plausible body plans for dragons, angels and flying horses. We had a lot of fun with this one and hope you do, too.

Laura Helmuth was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American. She previously worked as an editor for the Washington Post, National Geographic, Slate, Smithsonian and Science. She is a former president of the National Association of Science Writers. She is currently a member of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's standing committee on advancing science communication and an advisory board member for SciLine and The Transmitter. She has a Ph.D. in cognitive neuroscience from the University of California, Berkeley. She recently won a Friend of Darwin Award from the National Center for Science Education. Follow her on Bluesky @laurahelmuth.bsky.social

More by Laura Helmuth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 324 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Hard Lessons” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 324 No. 4 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0421-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe