How to Be an Effective Science Communicator

Telescopes on the moon, the mathematics of connections, new hope for dark matter, and realistic mythical beings

Scientific American April 2021

Scientific American April 2021

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In the Before Times, science and health journalists would talk about how much we appreciated our readers but just wished that more people took an interest. In the Pandemic Times, we have to add: but not like this! It's been a scary and exhausting year but also the most educational time in living memory. Hundreds of millions of people now understand concepts such as epidemiological modeling, asymptomatic transmission, herd immunity, phase 3 vaccine trials, and more. Our collective vocabulary has expanded with serious and grimly funny terms like “pandemic fine” (in response to “How are you?”) or “Blursday” (in response to “What day is it?”).

As the pandemic starts to come under control, we at Scientific American are grateful for all the scientists around the world who collaborated at lightning speed on studying the coronavirus and creating vaccines, the health-care workers who developed best practices to treat sick patients while their own lives were in danger, all the experts who talked with reporters to get the right information to the public, and especially to everyone—to all of you—who has helped spread knowledge.

Public policy scholar and communication professor Kathleen Hall Jamieson shares evidence-based, practical advice for how best to do just that. Anyone can be an effective science communicator and support a culture that endorses science by using her pro tips to help friends reject myths about the coronavirus, vaccines, masks, or (is this really the year 2021?) whether Earth is round or flat.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We have a trio of stories this month about how astronomers and physicists are using new technology to understand some of the biggest mysteries in the universe. The far side of our moon could soon be teeming with radio telescopes, orbiters and rovers, as author Anil Ananthaswamy explains. Shielded from Earth's radiation, it's an ideal place to look for signs of the universe's dark ages, the first few hundred million years after the big bang.

Adaptive optics technology gives telescopes a crisper view of distant objects by compensating for turbulence in the atmosphere—it's a way to “untwinkle the stars.” Astronomers Tony Travouillon and Céline d'Orgeville and optical instrumentation expert Francis Bennet share how the technology is now being used to study space debris and could allow clear and secure quantum-encrypted communication.

If any experiment is likely to detect dark matter particles in the coming years, it's a new version of XENON at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy. See the magnificent instruments being set up now, as senior editor Clara Moskowitz describes them.

Mathematics based on simple connection diagrams underlies some of the most complex networks of modern life, including cell-phone networks, viral memes on social media, or even the spread of disease. In our cover story, mathematician Kelsey Houston-Edwards shows the power of “percolation theory.”

Natural gas is the biggest source of electricity in the U.S., and consumption has risen about 30 percent in the past 15 years. It's not going away, but a range of achievable technologies can make it much more climate-friendly, as energy resources expert Michael E. Webber explains.

Our flight of fancy for April takes wing. Paleontologist Michael B. Habib and illustrator Terryl Whitlatch blend biomechanical rules and research on pterosaurs and other extinct creatures to create plausible body plans for dragons, angels and flying horses. We had a lot of fun with this one and hope you do, too.

Laura Helmuth was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American. She previously worked as an editor for the Washington Post, National Geographic, Slate, Smithsonian and Science. She is a former president of the National Association of Science Writers. She is currently a member of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's standing committee on advancing science communication and an advisory board member for SciLine and The Transmitter. She has a Ph.D. in cognitive neuroscience from the University of California, Berkeley. She recently won a Friend of Darwin Award from the National Center for Science Education. Follow her on Bluesky @laurahelmuth.bsky.social

More by Laura Helmuth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 324 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Hard Lessons” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 324 No. 4 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0421-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe