After a fight, most people want their partner to either disengage or to engage more meaningfully, according to a study of 953 married or cohabitating couples in the June 2013 issue of the Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. Which strategy to use depends on your partner's underlying concern in the argument: is he or she perceiving a threat or neglect?
A perceived threat encompasses anything that puts a partner's status in doubt, such as blame, criticism or demands, explains lead author Keith Sanford, a psychologist at Baylor University. In these scenarios, the offended party is more likely to want their partner to passively disengage by halting adversarial behavior and relinquishing power. “Giving up power comes in many forms, among them, admitting faults, showing respect and being willing to compromise,” Sanford says.
When perceiving neglect, individuals wanted their partner to actively engage by showing investment, communicating more and giving affection.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
No matter what the tenor of the fight, the participants ranked an apology as the least important factor in resolving the issue.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
