New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How to Get Elephants to Buzz Off

Researchers exploit a fear to reduce elephant-human confrontation

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mice don't actually scare elephants, but there is one tiny animal that the pachyderms definitely steer clear of: bees. It's a fear conservationists have begun to harness to keep elephants out of crops in Africa—a point of conflict that leaves hundreds of humans and elephants dead every year.

The Elephants and Bees Project, run by the nonprofit Save the Elephants, seeks to keep elephants from trampling and eating crops by building bee fences: wire fences strung with hives. The experimental project first began in Kenya in 2008 and has since expanded to six African countries. According to an upcoming paper in Conservation Biology, the buzzing fences have kept out 80 percent of the elephants that have approached them. These special barriers also provide locals with revenue from honey, says project leader Lucy King.

Air Shepherd, a program of the Charles A. and Anne Morrow Lindbergh Foundation, is simulating the threat of bee stings to minimize conflict. Last summer researchers brought drones to Malawi to search for poachers—and found that the noise of the quadcopters could spook elephants. “They sound like bees,” explains Otto Werdmuller Von Elgg, the program's head of drone operations. In addition to its antipoaching efforts, Air Shepherd now also spends nearly every night flying the buzzing quadcopters along crop fences and around Liwonde National Park as an elephant deterrent. Drones are not yet legal in every African country, but Von Elgg thinks the idea will eventually fly in more locations. “One drone is enough to move a herd of 100 elephants,” he says.

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt
Scientific American Magazine Vol 316 Issue 3This article was published with the title “How to Get Elephants to Buzz Off” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 316 No. 3 (), p. 23
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0317-23

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe