How to Keep Mink Happy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite being bred in captivity for 70 generations, farm-raised mink still long to swim, according to a report published today in the journal Nature. The findings could influence how animals kept for human use are treated.

Assessing animal welfare is no easy task, especially when it comes to evaluating a creature's subjective experiences. But Georgia J. Mason of the University of Oxford and her colleagues were able to do just that by studying how hard the minks were willing to work in order to gain access to things like toys, an alternative nesting site and a water pool. What the minks prized above all, it turns out, was the pool. Moreover, when the researchers blocked access to the pool and measured the levels of the stress hormone cortisol in the minks' urine 24 hours later, they found a 50 percent increase in cortisol production¿a rise indistinguishable from that caused by food deprivation over the same period.

Applying the techniques employed by Mason's group to other captive animals should enable scientists to decide whether depriving them of resources and opportunities to behave instinctively causes frustration and stress, Michael Mendl of the University of Bristol remarks in a commentary accompanying the report. "If so, scientific argument for their provision will be strong and should form the basis for decisions to alter housing conditions, even though such decisions will inevitably be coloured by political, economic and practical decisions."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe