How to Make Tools on Mars, Using Dust

You can't carry everything you need from Earth, so researchers made 3-D–printed shapes with mocked-up Mars dust

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Dust and rock particles that mimic regolith on the surfaces of the Moon and Mars have been turned into 3D printer inks, offering a glimpse into how humans might one day use local materials in situ to construct and maintain extraterrestrial outposts.

3D printing approaches have already been demonstrated to make objects from simulated lunar and Martian regolith. However, these are not well suited for use in extreme, resource-starved, low-gravity environments due to processing limitations and high energy requirements. What’s more, although useful, the resulting objects have always been hard and inflexible.

Now Adam Jakus and colleagues in Ramille Shah’s lab at Northwestern University, US, have developed a system that prints soft, rubber-like objects—including cylinders, spanners and stackable LEGO-shaped blocks—using simulated Mars and Moon dust inks for the first time. Sintering can then harden the materials, giving the option of both soft and hard structures. ‘The simplicity of the printing system […] and the potential for in situ resource utilisation makes this desirable for extraterrestrial exploration,’ says Jakus.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To make the inks, the team combined a solvent mixture containing an evaporant, surfactant, and plasticiser with simulant powders and the biopolymer polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA), which acts as an elastomeric binder. The regolith simulants comprised unrefined volcanic materials certified by Nasa as very close in composition and form to those found in specific regions of the Moon and Mars. Apart from sieving to remove larger particles that would compromise the printing process, these materials were unprocessed, as they would be in space.

Importantly, PLGA is derived from lactic acid and glycolic acid monomers, which are common natural products found in urine and other biological waste. ‘This is ideal for environments where you need to make use out of absolutely everything and recycle absolutely everything,’ says Jakus. What’s more, none of the solvents are chemically transformed or spent during the process, so they could be collected and recycled.

Previous work from Shah’s lab has shown the same technique can print other materials. ‘Metal, ceramic, and biomaterial printing [are] possible using the same approach,’ says Jakus. ‘This is extremely useful in environments where you just can’t have a different kind of machine, or 3D printer, for each separate material you need to work with.’

‘What I like about this concept is that this less energy-intensive and autonomous process can deliver elastic components using feedstock that can be synthesised in situ, [despite] the rather complex regolith chemistry,’ comments Thanos Goulas who investigates 3D printing of lunar regolith materials at Loughborough University, UK. He wonders, however, if surface and gravity conditions on the Moon and Mars may hamper the process. ‘This is unknown until physical experimentation can be performed in an as close a simulated environment as possible.’

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on April 21, 2017.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe