How to Round Numbers (Part 2)

The Math Dude: Quick & Dirty Tips to Make Math Simpler

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientific American presentsMath Dudeby Quick & Dirty Tips. Scientific American and Quick & Dirty Tips are both Macmillan companies.

In the last Math Dude episode, we learned the ins and outs of rounding numbers. And, hopefully, we learned (or were reminded) that rounding numbers is pretty easy. But as it turns out, that's not exactly true—because there are a few tricky situations when it's not.

What are they? Here's a hint: They have something to do with the number 5. How do you deal with this pesky number 5? And does this ever matter in the real world? Those are exactly the questions we'll be answering today.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


How to Break Rounding Ties
When it comes to rounding numbers, the only real question is which way to round the number 5. In other words, how should we break a tie? For example, if we want to round π = 3.14159 to the thousandths place (that's the second 1 in 3.14159), do we round up to get 3.142? Or do we round down to get 3.141? As we found out last time, the rule of thumb is to round up.

But why exactly do we do this? Well, I'm sorry to have to break this to you, but the truth is that there really isn't a deep reason for all of the rounding up we do. The simple truth is that 5 is right smack-dab in the middle, which means that there isn't one and only one correct way to do it. However, since we do ultimately have to go one way or the other, we need to make a choice—and rounding up is the convention that has been adopted most broadly.

> Continue reading on QuickAndDirtyTips.com

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe