New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

How Vision Helps Cyclists Communicate in a Pack  

Riders in a peloton benefit more from the eyes of their peers than from a neighbor’s drag reduction 

JEFF PACHOUD Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Like a school of fish or flock of birds, a pack of bicycle riders (technically called a “peloton”) often behaves like a unified entity. When individuals engage in simple small-scale behaviors, a collective pattern emerges that helps the whole. But in densely packed groups, it can be unclear what determines each individual's behavior. Mathematicians and biologists have argued that cyclists' movements within a peloton are primarily driven by optimizing aerodynamics, but new research suggests a different explanation.

Jesse Belden of the U.S. Naval Undersea Warfare Center and Tadd Truscott of Utah State University have found that visual input plays a critical role in how cyclists position themselves within the pack: individuals subconsciously form a diamond-shaped pattern that optimizes their peripheral vision, helping them quickly respond to others' changes in motion.

Pairs of cyclists save the most energy when one rider follows closely behind another. But for pelotons, Belden says, “we don't see that pattern inside a group. Aerodynamics only matters at the outside edge—you save energy wherever you are inside a pack.” Previous studies in animals ranging from locusts to birds suggested that vision helps to shape the group as a whole, but they did not explain how it shapes individual behavior. To find out, researchers decided to study professional cyclists.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


While examining helicopter footage of Tour de France races, Belden, Truscott and their colleagues noticed two behaviors that caused fluidlike ripples through the peloton. In one, a rider would brake and other riders would slow to avoid a collision. In the other, a rider would move sideways to skirt an obstacle or fill a gap. These movements produced waves moving forward and backward or left and right through the peloton, respectively. The left-right waves propagated relatively slowly—at the speed it takes a human to respond to an immediate neighbor's motions. The forward-backward waves, however, propagated much faster, implying that individuals had anticipated changes in response to the motion of someone two riders ahead.

These wave findings suggest that vision is the main influence on individual rider behavior because riders want to keep neighbors within the range of peripheral vision most sensitive to motion. Apart from long-term race goals, each cyclist's main objective is to avoid crashing; riders do so by maintaining a position that lets them focus on what is in front while keeping more space between side-flanking neighbors. The work was presented last November at the 71st Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society Division of Fluid Dynamics.

The researchers say their findings could be applied to explain collective animal behavior, help optimize exit plans in crowded spaces or program collections of autonomous robots.

Rachel Berkowitz is a freelance science writer and a corresponding editor for Physics Magazine. She is based in Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eastsound, Wash.

More by Rachel Berkowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 320 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Eyes of the Peloton” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 320 No. 3 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0319-12a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe