New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How Wasted Food Turns into Huge Amounts of Greenhouse Gas

Here’s how food loss and waste threaten the planet at every stage, from harvest to consumption

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Around a third of human-generated greenhouse gas emissions comes from the global food system, and lost or wasted food is known to contribute some amount—but it has never been clear to exactly what degree. Now, by following specific foods through their entire life cycle, researchers have determined just how much this wasted food adds to emissions through phases such as harvest, transportation and disposal.

For a study in Nature Food, Xunchang Fei of Singapore's Nanyang Technological University and his colleagues used 164 countries' food supply data from 2001 to 2017 to estimate emissions across 54 food commodities and four categories: cereals and pulses; meat and animal products; vegetables and fruits; and root and oil crops.

Credit: Jade Khatib; Source: “Cradle-to-Grave Emissions from Food Loss and Waste Represent Half of Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Food Systems,” by Jingyu Zhu et al., in Nature Food, Vol. 4; March 2023 (data)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Roughly a third of food is lost during harvest, storage and transportation or is wasted by consumers. The team found this food was responsible for greenhouse gases equivalent to 9.3 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide—about half the global food system's total emissions—in 2017. Four countries (China, the U.S., India and Brazil) contributed 44.3 percent, mainly owing to their dietary habits and large populations. Of the four food categories, meat and animal products were the source of almost three quarters of emissions that occurred during the supply-chain phase for food that was ultimately lost.

The study considered emissions across nine postfarming stages, which vary among regions—for instance, developed countries' advanced waste-treatment technologies can create fewer emissions. Such intricate details show how “different countries should set different targets for [food loss and waste] reductions,” Fei says—such as reducing meat production in some areas, and switching from landfills to anaerobic digestion or composting processes in others.

Credit: Jade Khatib; Source: “Cradle-to-Grave Emissions from Food Loss and Waste Represent Half of Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Food Systems,” by Jingyu Zhu et al., in Nature Food, Vol. 4; March 2023 (data)

Food systems expert Prajal Pradhan of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany notes that the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals aim to halve food waste in the coming years—which Pradhan says wouldn't be enough to limit global warming but would be a start. Based on this study, he says, emissions could decrease if “high-income countries could focus on saving food discarded by consumers, and low- and middle-income countries could prioritize avoiding food loss during harvesting, processing, storage and transport.”

Deepa Padmanaban is a freelance journalist based in India who writes on the environment and climate change. Follow her on Twitter @deepa_padma

More by Deepa Padmanaban
Scientific American Magazine Vol 329 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Waste Not” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 329 No. 1 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0723-14

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe