How We Made an Octopus-Inspired Surgical Robot Using Coffee

A new robotic tentacle has the potential to improve keyhole surgery

The following essay is reprinted with permission from The Conversation, an online publication covering the latest research.

The unparalleled motion and manipulation abilities of soft-bodied animals such as the octopus have intrigued biologists for many years. How can an animal that has no bones transform its tentacles from a soft state to a one stiff enough to catch and even kill prey?

A group of scientists and engineers has attempted to answer this question in order to replicate the abilities of an octopus tentacle in a robotic surgical tool. Last week, members of this EU-funded project known as STIFF-FLOP (STIFFness controllable Flexible and Learnable manipulator for surgical OPerations) unveiled the group’s latest efforts.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Conventional surgical robots are based on structures made from rigid linked components. This means they can only reach sites inside a patient’s abdomen by moving along straight lines and cannot navigate around organs that may be in the way. It also means they risk damaging healthy tissue during an operation.


Robotic octopus arms have much greater freedom of movement than conventional surgical robots

Work by biologists from the Hebrew University in Israel on the underlying functions of octopus motion and control have led to a promising new approach. By mimicking the octopus’s ability to alter the stiffness of its arm, the new robotic device can squeeze through narrow openings and adapt to the environment inside a patient’s body.

This will enable it to move past and manipulate delicate organs without damaging them. Equipping the arm with a surgical tool, such as a gripper or cutter, will give surgeons a way to conduct keyhole surgery in a more intuitive and safe manner.

The STIFF-FLOP bio-robotics team at the Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (SSSA), Pisa, created a slender, soft and modular structure from silicone that moves using pneumatic actuators. This means the robot is capable of making patterns of movement that are strikingly similar to the way octopuses moves their tentacles.

To make the robot’s movement even more like those of its biological role model and enable changes in stiffness, SSSA joined forces with my team at King’s College London to employ a technique called granular jamming. This uses a flexible balloon-like chamber filled with small granules. When the air is sucked out of the chamber, the granules within are compressed or jammed against each other and the whole chamber becomes stiff.


The STIFF-FLOP robotic arm has much greater motion and manipulation abilities

This effect is the same as the one used to vacuum-pack ground coffee for sale in the supermarket. In fact, the granules used in the STIFF-FLOP robot prototypes are actually ground coffee granules because of their excellent jamming behaviour.

By integrating these granule-filled chambers with the robot arm, it can be “frozen” in specific positions. This means it can be locked in place once it has reached a location within a patient’s abdomen were an operation needs to be conducted.

This new design has proven capable of morphing from a completely relaxed state to a very stiff state, while providing ample space for surgical instruments to be integrated. As such, we plan to carry out the world’s first soft-robotic surgery on human cadavers by the end of this year, under the direction of world-leading surgeons from the University of Turin and Guy’s Hospital, London.


The STIFF-FLOP tentacle in action in simulated surgery

But octopus-inspired robots could also find uses in several other areas where changing their stiffness will be useful. For example, they could be used for industrial inspection especially where the robot needs to squeeze through a narrow opening and then extend into an otherwise inaccessible or dangerous area. This idea is of particular interest to the nuclear energy industry, which is already employing rigid, snake-like robots for such tasks.

Another potential application is assisting with search and rescue operations and bomb disposal. This is because robots that can adapt to the shape of their environment would be particular handy when they need to interact with fragile objects or humans.

Kaspar Althoefer, at King's College London, does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe