New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Hubble Glimpses New Moons around Uranus

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers have detected two new moons around Uranus. Recent observations with NASA's Hubble Space Telescope uncovered the presence of the smallest satellites yet discovered orbiting the planet.

Mark Showalter of Stanford University and Jack Lissauer of NASA's Ames Research Center studied images of Uranus taken last month by Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS). The two moons--temporarily dubbed S/2003 U 1 and S/2003 U 2--are extremely faint and eluded detection by the Voyager 2 spacecraft during its flyby of the planet in 1986. "It's a testament to how much our Earth-based instruments have improved in 20-plus years that we can now see such faint objects 2.8 billion kilometers away," Showalter says. Indeed, the two moons are 40 million times dimmer than Uranus is and the researchers had to overexpose the images in order to pinpoint their locations. S/2003 U 1 is the larger of the pair, measuring 16 kilometers across, whereas S/2003 U 2 is just 12 kilometers wide. The discovery brings the total number of moons in the Uranian system to 24, placing it third behind Jupiter's 38 officially-named moons and Saturn's 30.

Both S/2003 U 1 and S/2003 U 2 circle Uranus in less than a day, with paths that bring them close to the planet's bigger, better-known moons Puck, Miranda and Belinda. "The inner swarm of 13 satellites is unlike any other system of planetary moons," Lissauer remarks. "The larger moons must be gravitationally perturbing the smaller moons. The region is so crowded that these moons could be gravitationally unstable. So, we are trying to understand how the moons can coexist with each other."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe