New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Hubble Telescope Stops Collecting Data after Mechanical Fault

A malfunctioning gyroscope has temporarily hobbled the aging space observatory

Astronauts work on Hubble during a 1999 mission to service its gyroscopes.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Hubble Space Telescope stopped collecting science data on 5 October, because of a problem with one of the gyroscopes that the observatory uses to orient itself on celestial targets. Mission controllers are investigating the problem and expect to have Hubble working again soon.

“Don’t worry, Hubble has many great years of science ahead,” says Kenneth Sembach, director of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland, which operates Hubble.

But the glitch underscores that the 2.4-metre Hubble, perhaps the most iconic space observatory in history, will eventually die. NASA’s decision to retire its space shuttles in 2011 means that astronauts cannot service the 28-year-old observatory as they once did.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On their last servicing mission in May 2009, astronauts replaced all six of Hubble’s gyroscopes. Three of those were of a new design meant to last much longer than the previous designs. The one that failed was the first of the new model to go.

Hubble can operate on just two gyroscopes, or even one, but that limits its ability to point at targets. Its successor, the 6.5-metre James Webb Space Telescope, will not launch until 2021 at the earliest.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on October 8, 2018.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe