Hubble Weighs In on Heavy Element Emergence

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope to probe a neighboring galaxy have made a surprising discovery in its cosmic compost. According to findings presented on Monday at the American Astronomical Society's meeting in Pasadena, Calif., the composition of interstellar dust clouds in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) differs from that of the Milky Way's dust clouds. The discovery could force researchers to rethink current ideas about interstellar dust and the evolution of heavy elements.

Daniel Welty of the University of Chicago and his colleagues employed Hubble's imaging spectrograph to comb through the recyclable remnants of dead stars in the SMC. Previously scientists had assumed that the makeup of interstellar clouds is the same from one cloud to another. But absorption line spectroscopy analysis revealed that, in fact, the relative proportions of some heavy elements differ between clouds in the two galaxies. Specifically, whereas the gas in the Milky Way's interstellar clouds lack iron and silicon (which suggests that those elements occupy the dust instead), the gas in the SMC's interstellar clouds exhibits low iron content and high silicon content¿indicating that the dust there contains little silicon.

"This could be a breakthrough in actually measuring the different ways in which solid particles can form and develop in space, which ultimately will help us understand star formation," team member Donald York observes. If the SMC's dust is indeed composed primarily of iron, the researchers note, this could affect stellar development. Says York, "One needs grains to produce molecular hydrogen to produce cooling to produce stars."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe