Huge Plant-Eating Dinosaur Never Ran Out of Teeth

High rates of tooth growth helped sauropods eat vegetation, scientists say

Some plant-eating dinosaurs grew new teeth every couple of months, with some of the largest herbivores developing a replacement tooth every 35 days, to keep their chompers from getting too worn down on all that vegetation, new research finds.

A team of scientists studied the Diplodocus and Camarasaurus, two different types of long-necked, plant-eating dinosaurs, or sauropods, to determine if their diets may have influenced how often they developed new teeth. They found that Diplodocus, the longest dinosaur yet discovered, replaced their teeth fairly frequently — growing one new tooth every 35 days — while the Camarasaurus took nearly twice as long, about 62 days, to form a new tooth.

"Diplodocus and its relatives have the fastest tooth replacement rate of any dinosaur," said Michael D'Emic, lead author of the new study, and a paleontologist in the department of anatomical sciences at Stony Brook University in Stony Brook, N.Y.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


D'Emic and his colleagues also found that these plant-eating dinosaurs carried several spare teeth in their jaws.

"Some of these sauropod species have up to nine baby teeth in each socket waiting to take the old one's place," D'Emic told LiveScience. "It's pretty incredible."

Dino dental records

Each Diplodocus tooth socket held up to five replacement teeth, plus the functioning tooth, and the Camarasaurus could keep up to three spare "baby teeth" lined up in each of its tooth sockets, he added.

As teeth form, layers of a calcified tissue, called dentin, build up underneath a cap of enamel. "The bulk of the tooth is dentin, and this dentin is made day by day," D'Emic explained. "You end up getting something similar to tree rings, where each day there's going to be a ring in the tooth."

The researchers dissected fossilized teeth from both types of sauropods and examined thin slices of the teeth under a powerful microscope. This allowed the scientists to carefully study the tiny rings of dentin, which measure about a quarter of the width of a human hair, inside each tooth. These layers enable the scientists to tease out information about the rate of tooth formation and replacement in extinct animals.

Diplodocus and Camarasaurus both roamed the Earth about 150 million years ago, largely in regions within the modern-day western United States. Despite their long necks and giant bodies, these sauropods had small heads and tiny teeth. The dinosaurs typically had between 20 and 30 teeth in their upper and lower jaws, and these teeth likely experienced a lot of wear as the sauropods fed on the available vegetation, D'Emic said.

"Some of these animals were more than 90 feet [27 meters] long, and they had heads only a bit bigger than that of a horse, so that's a lot of food that has to go through there," he said. "To compensate for that, they must have evolved a response in which their tooth replacement rate increased."

Quantity over quality

Yet, compared to mammals today, these plant-eating dinosaurs developed teeth with thinner coats of enamel, which made them less hardy and resilient, the researchers said. This indicates that among herbivorous dinosaurs, the tooth replacement process had evolved to favor quantity over quality, the scientists said.

And while both the Diplodocus and Camarasaurus are sauropods, they are only distantly related to one another, the researchers said. This made them compelling case studies to study the effect of diet and ecology on the dinosaurs' teeth, D'Emic said.

"They both have long necks and long tails, but their heads are shaped differently, and they had different body postures," D'Emic said. "They also had very differently shaped teeth: The Camarasaurus had bigger teeth."

The differences in the dental records of the Diplodocus and Camarasaurus may indicate that the dinosaurs ate different types of vegetation. "It suggests they were eating different things, and that's probably one of the reasons they could have lived in the same place at the same time for so long," D'Emic said.

The paleontologists intend to expand their research by studying teeth from other dinosaur species, including meat-eaters. The detailed results of their new study were published online today (July 17) in the journal PLOS ONE.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

 

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe