New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

First 3D Images of Human Embryo Implantation Reveal New Details of the Process

Analyzing embryo movements in uteruslike environments could offer clues to improving the success rate of in vitro fertilization

Human embryo confocal image

A confocal microscopy image of a nine-day-old human embryo. Specific proteins and cellular structures have been colored in the image: OCT4 (green), which is related to embryonic stem cells; GATA6 (magenta), which is associated with early tissue formation; DAPI (blue), which marks the DNA in the nuclei; and phalloidin (red), which reveals the actin cytoskeleton. The scale bar corresponds to 100 microns.

Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)

Researchers have captured the very first real-time, three-dimensional images and videos of a human embryo implanting into synthetic uterine tissue—revealing a key stage in reproduction. The resulting footage, which shows in vivid detail how embryos push and pull to anchor themselves in the uterus, could lead to improvements for in vitro fertilization techniques, the scientists say.

“This will allow us to develop treatments specifically targeting implantation, which is the biggest roadblock in human reproduction,” says Samuel Ojosnegros, a bioengineer at the Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology and a co-author of the new study in Science Advances.

A few days after an embryo is fertilized artificially, fertility doctors must implant it into the body so it can continue to grow. “What happens between the transfer and the first ultrasound weeks later is a black box,” says Ojosnegros, who is also co-founder of biotech company Serabiotics. Implantation failure is one of the main causes of infertility—up to 60 percent of miscarriages occur during this process.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The first successful cultures of human embryos beyond the moment of implantation were demonstrated in laboratory petri dishes in 2016, but Ojosnegros and his colleagues wanted to see what this process would look like in 3D tissue that was more similar to that of the uterus.

To do this, the team designed a special system made of gel and collagen, a protein found in the uterine lining, and introduced embryos donated by people who had completed an assisted reproduction process. Their system prompted implantation, Ojosnegros says, because the network of collagen fibers signals the expected location and texture to the embryo at a molecular level.

The researchers recorded the action over time using advanced 3D microscopes. Tracking tiny movements in the gel’s fibers let them map exactly where and how strongly the embryos were pulling on the surrounding tissue. They then did the same with mouse embryos to compare their movement patterns.

The footage showed that human embryos generate a network of tiny pulling forces that ripple through the womb. These embryos burrow into the surrounding tissue by creating multiple small traction points that tug the lining in all directions. Mouse embryos, in contrast, spread out more across the surface and pull mainly along two or three strong lines.

An animation of an embryo morphing on a blue background

An embryo compacting and invading the uterine tissue.

Sarah Moreira Castro

When the researchers applied external tension to the matrix, tugging it with tiny forceps, they noticed the embryos reoriented toward those areas. The scientists suggest microcontractions in the uterus might direct the embryo to the optimal implantation surface. “We believe these microcontractions are what the embryo uses to guide itself toward the blood vessels and the nutrients it needs,” Ojosnegros explains, adding that more studies are needed to support this hypothesis.

In both mouse and human experiments, the strength and pattern of the pulling forces were linked to the embryos’ potential success, meaning embryos that pulled less were less likely to invade the tissue. Observing implantation in real time in a 3D model is a “quantum leap” compared with the two-dimensional observations that already exist, says developmental biologist Claudia Spits of the Free University of Brussels, who was also not involved in the new study. Keeping an embryo alive under these conditions is extremely difficult, she says. “What you see in a 10-second video is years of setting these [conditions] up so that the embryo can survive,” Spits adds.

An animation of two different embryos morphing side by side

Two embryos implanting in the uterus.

Sarah Moreira Castro

“This study sets the stage to explore the dynamics of implantation in unprecedented detail,” says Magdalena Żernicka-Goetz, a developmental biologist at the California Institute of Technology, who was not involved in the research. The findings add to the growing library of human postimplantation observations published in the past nine years, she says, and “these studies are a thrilling step forward in understanding a stage of human development that has long been hidden from view.” Future research, Żernicka-Goetz notes, is still needed to compare how embryos behave across different “uteruslike” platforms to see whether developmental trajectories differ.

The matrix developed by Ojosnegros’s team is not intended for in vitro fertilization procedures, but it could be a valuable tool for pharmaceutical company and lab testing. “By beginning to understand how the embryo behaves,” Ojosnegros says, “we can start thinking about the future possibility of selecting healthy embryos or those more capable of implanting.” Spits remains skeptical of that assertion because replicating this technology in other labs could be a major challenge. But she says the results are a “major step forward” in tech that could have future applications once other labs are able to do their own 3D implantations.

Humberto Basilio is a Mexican science journalist covering policy, health, misconduct, archaeology and the environment. He is also a former news intern at Scientific American. His work has been published in the New York Times, National Geographic, Science, Nature, and more.

More by Humberto Basilio
Scientific American Magazine Vol 333 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Developing Views” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 333 No. 4 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican112025-7e4xNMSRPHXldCgkHUYraI

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe