New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

"Human Sleep Project" Could Unlock the Secrets to a Good Night's Rest

What we could learn by monitoring sleep patterns of the entire world

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Everyone knows the crankiness, puffy eyes and excessive yawning that follow a bad night's sleep. Those chronically sleep-deprived also have increased risks of heart disease, obesity and early death. Because sleep patterns are difficult to monitor in large populations, researchers do not know what causes many sleep problems or how exactly these problems affect us. Till Roenneberg, a chronobiologist at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, thinks a global “human sleep project” could finally solve some of these mysteries.

A common way to collect sleep data is through retrospective surveys of sleep habits, but they are unreliable because people tend to overestimate how much sleep they get. Laboratory studies are accurate but do not reproduce real-life behaviors. A global sleep project, proposed in a June issue of Nature (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group), would outfit people with a variety of sensors to track their sleep patterns in real-time and, as a bonus, provide detailed feedback to the subjects.

“If people can actually see their own data on their own Internet-based platform, I think we will not get 100 or 1,000 but a million people who will participate,” Roenneberg says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With all those data, researchers could tease out the lifestyle factors that ensure healthy sleep. “Much like satellite studies of weather, it is the larger view that will reveal global patterns, limits and interactions between factors we typically hold constant in the lab,” says Max Hirshkowitz, a spokesperson for the National Sleep Foundation. He believes a global sleep project would also illuminate how culture, occupation and geography all influence sleep patterns.

A project on this scale would cost about $30 million, Roenneberg says, which is a lot for a field that is, like sleep itself, chronically undervalued. “Sleep is unconscious and not apparently productive—it's not like making money or making children—so people think that they can neglect it,” he says. His hoped-for global data could be a wake-up call on the importance of shut-eye.

Melinda Wenner Moyer, a contributing editor at Scientific American, is author of Hello, Cruel World! Science-Based Strategies for Raising Terrific Kids in Terrifying Times (G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 2025).

More by Melinda Wenner Moyer
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Wisdom of the Sleepyheads” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 3 (), p. 15
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0913-15

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe