New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

More Humanlike Mouse Stem Cells Discovered

Finding may enhance understanding of human embryonic stem cells and lead to better models for regenerative therapies

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Two independent British research groups have discovered new stem cells in mouse embryos that could help enhance understanding of human embryonic stem cells as well as move scientists closer to harnessing these cells' full healing power.

When studying disease, scientists often rely on mice, which they can genetically manipulate to try to figure out the cause of illnesses. But mice are not always the best models for human cell behavior. One glaring example: mouse embryonic stem cells, first derived roughly 25 years ago. This is because mouse stem cells use different chemical pathways than their human counterparts do to retain their pluripotency (ability to morph into any tissue type). This difference has meant that mouse stem cells are a poor research proxy for human stem cells.

But researchers report this week in Nature that they discovered a new mouse embryo–derived stem cell that behaves much like a human embryonic stem cell—which could make mouse models more valuable research tools. The teams, from the universities of Cambridge and Oxford in England, say the key may be in the timing: They plucked the cells from mouse embryos two days later than researchers ordinarily do.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The scientists say these cells' humanlike quality can provide insight into how human embryonic cells operate.

"This is a new type of embryonic stem cell isolated from mice—in both studies—and [from] rats [in our research] that has very strikingly similar properties to human embryonic stem cells," says Roger Pederson, a professor of regenerative medicine at Cambridge and a co-author of one paper. "This is very intriguing, because it can provide a model for studying and accelerating studies of human embryonic stem cells."

Sir Richard Gardner, a professor of mammalian development at Oxford, adds that the findings indicate that researchers can derive pluripotent stem cells similar to those in humans from mice (and, conceivably, from a host of other mammals) if they harvest them at different stages of an embryo's development.

Both groups extracted cells during a phase in embryonic development when pluripotent cells are huddled in the epiblast (the innermost layer of the embryo). This stage of development occurs just before gastrulation, during which embryonic cells begin to mature into tissue that will ultimately become the lungs, heart, kidneys, blood and everything else in the human body. The Cambridge group also found and harvested cells in rats, which had previously failed to produce viable stem cells in the lab.

Pedersen says the new finding in combination with the wealth on information available on mouse genetics could help researchers learn more about human diseases, such as type 1 diabetes. "If you don't know where you are to start with, you're going to fumble around a lot and that's where we've been with regard to human embryonic stem cells," he says.

Gardner sees things differently. He believes the results of these studies demonstrate that the properties of human embryonic stem cells are likely conserved in other mammals in addition to the mouse. In fact, given that many disease models in mice are poor for studying human illness—including, he points out, cystic fibrosis and other pulmonary disorders, for which scientists rely on sheep—the new finding should encourage scientists to find mammals that can serve as better embryonic stem cell proxies for humans.

"What this tells us is if you use different conditions, you can get pluripotential stem cells out of the mouse, so it's going to encourage people to go back and do the same on any other mammal," he explains. "There is no reason why you shouldn't be able to find an animal that is more close to the human in this regard than the mouse."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe