Humans Have Significantly Interrupted the Free Flow of Rivers

Dams are the single biggest impediment to river connectivity, which is crucial to maintaining healthy ecosystems 

Ethiopian workers stand on scaffolding on March 31, 2015 during the construction of the Grand Renaissance Dam near the Sudanese-Ethiopian border.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Rivers are terrestrial arteries for the nutrients, sediment and freshwater that sustain healthy, diverse ecosystems. Their influence extends in multiple dimensions—not only along their length but belowground to aquifers and periodically into nearby floodplains.

They also provide vital services for people by fertilizing agricultural land and feeding key fisheries and by acting as transportation corridors. But in efforts to ease ship passage, protect communities from flooding, and siphon off water for drinking and irrigation, humans have increasingly constrained and fractured these crucial waterways. “We try to tame rivers as much as possible,” says Günther Grill, a hydrologist at McGill University.

In new research published in May in Nature, Grill and his colleagues analyzed the impediments to 12 million total kilometers of rivers around the world. The team developed an index that evaluates six aspects of connectivity—from physical fragmentation (by dams, for example) to flow regulation (by dams or levees) to water consumption—along a river's various dimensions. Rivers whose indices meet a certain threshold for being largely able to follow their natural patterns were considered free-flowing.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Credit: Melissa Thomas Baum, Buckyball Design; Source: “Mapping the World’s Free-Flowing Rivers,” by G. Grill et al., in Nature, Vol. 569; May 9, 2019

The researchers found that among rivers longer than 1,000 kilometers (which tend to be some of those most important to human activities), only 37 percent are unimpeded along their entire lengths (graphic). Most of these big unhindered rivers are in areas with a minimal human presence, including the Amazon and Congo basins and the Arctic. Conversely, most rivers shorter than 100 kilometers appeared to flow freely—but the data on them are less comprehensive, and some barriers might have been missed. Only 23 percent of the subset of the longest rivers that connect to the ocean are uninterrupted. For the rest, human infrastructure is starving estuaries and deltas (such as the Mississippi Delta) of key nutrients. The world's estimated 2.8 million dams are the main culprit, controlling water flow and trapping sediment.

The new research could be used to better understand how proposed dams, levees and other such projects might impact river connectivity, as well as where to remove these fixtures to best restore natural flow. It could also help inform our approach to rivers as the climate changes, says Anne Jefferson, a hydrologist at Kent State University, who was not involved in the work. Existing infrastructure, she says, “has essentially been built to a past climate that we are not in anymore and are increasingly moving away from.”

Andrea Thompson is senior desk editor for life science at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and earth sciences. She has been covering these issues for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 321 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Damming Evidence” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 321 No. 2 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0819-16a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe