Hunger Intensifies Taste, Study Shows

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Hunger is the downfall of many dieters, causing them to reach for the closest, but not necessarily the healthiest, foods. What they end up eating may taste different, too. New findings suggest that hunger affects how food tastes by making peckish people more sensitive to sweetness and saltiness.

A number of factors, including obesity, oral hygiene, drinking and smoking, have been shown to alter a person¿s ability to taste. In the new work, published today in the journal BMC Neuroscience, Yuriy P. Zverev of the University of Malawi investigated how overnight fasting affected the taste buds of healthy males who neither smoked nor drank. After eating a set meal for dinner, the subjects skipped breakfast and were subsequently tested on their ability to taste salty, sweet and bitter solutions of varying concentrations. The participants returned later in the day, about an hour after eating lunch, and repeated the blind taste tests. When hungry, the men detected lower concentrations of sugar and salt than they did after a meal, but their ability to detect bitter compounds remained unchanged.

Zverey posits that the consistency of a person¿s sensitivity bitterness may be part of a defensive mechanism for avoiding eating something dangerous because of hunger. "While sweet and salty tastes are indicators of edible substances and trigger consumption," he says, "a bitter taste indicates a substance which is not suitable for consumption and should be rejected."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe