New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Hungry for Love

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The rush we feel when newly in love is not an emotion. It is a reward produced by ancient brain pathways that similarly motivate eating and drinking, according to a new, multi-institute study. The results indicate that during the intoxicating early stages of a relationship, “we are driven,” says Lucy L. Brown, a neuroscientist at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and a co-author of the study. “The person we are in love with becomes a goal in our lives.”

Brown and her colleagues recruited 17 subjects who were 18 to 26 years old and had been smitten for one to 17 months. The researchers used functional magnetic resonance imaging to see how the subjects’ brains responded to a picture of their beloved, in contrast with an image of an acquaintance. For every lovebird, gazing at his or her sweetheart activated the unconscious neural system associated with reward, which arose early in mammalian evolution to encourage vital behaviors. Other neural activity varied; for example, some individuals who had been in love for more than eight months had stronger signals in cortical areas involved in cognition and emotion.

Brown concludes that early romantic love is not an emotion but a motivational state. The brain encourages an intense focus on the beloved through the reward system. Then, thanks to the many neural systems linked to our reward circuitry, we experience other feelings. “When you are in love, you can be anxious, happy, sad or angry,” Brown says, “but you still have a core feeling of loving the person.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Eventually Brown would like to follow relationships that last for years, to understand what happens “when people form attachments and what goes wrong when people don’t,” she explains. In the meantime, her group is studying personal rejection by showing subjects a picture of a recent ex-boyfriend or ex-girlfriend, which Brown notes “is not so rewarding.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe