Hunt for Solar Technology Identifies Best-Yet Organic Semiconducting Molecule

Theoretical screening method produces first sample molecule as researchers analyse 3.5 million candidates for solar cells.

By Jeff Tollefson of Nature magazine

US researchers have used computer modeling to identify an organic molecule with useful electrical properties - proof-of-concept for an approach that could soon yield new compounds to harvest solar energy in photovoltaic cells.

Alán Aspuru-Guzik, a theoretical chemist at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and his colleagues, used computational models to screen a family of organic molecules and identify those likely to be the best semiconductors. The team passed the finding to researchers at Stanford University in California, who have now synthesized the molecule and confirmed its properties.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The results are encouraging for Aspuru-Guzik, who, in collaboration with computer giant IBM, is using the same computational tools to screen some 3.5 million organic molecules in the search for a new generation of flexible and lightweight solar cells. His team plans to publish the structures of the 1,000 molecules with the most useful calculated properties, in an effort to help bench chemists focus on the best structures to synthesize.

The project, which has been running for more than two years, employs some of the same methods used by drug companies. "It's how the pharmaceutical people do it: the theorists give a ranking to the experimentalists," says Aspuru-Guzik. "We're trying to save experimental time."

From theory to reality

The latest molecule is one of the best organic semiconductors yet discovered, in terms of its ability to transport electric charge. The study is published in Nature Communications today.

"It's beautiful work," says Thuc-Quyen Nguyen, a chemist at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Chemists have typically focused on individual compounds or families but systematic screening could save time and reveal new opportunities, she says. "That's the novelty of the approach."

Aspuru-Guzik started the screening process by identifying a known organic semiconductor with desirable properties. He then designed some possible derivatives of that compound, and used quantum and molecular mechanical models to predict their properties. His team passed the structure of the best candidate along to Zhenan Bao, a synthetic chemist at Stanford, and her colleagues, who spent six months making the chemical and then tested it in an experimental transistor.

Bao's team was pleasantly surprised to discover that the molecule conducted electric charge between three and four times better than predicted. This shows how difficult it is to predict a molecule's properties accurately, but confirms that models are good at ranking molecules according to their relative performance, says Bao.

As experimentalists synthesize theoretically designed molecules in future, their data will help theorists to improve their own models. "This will be an iterative process," she says. "Hopefully the theory will get better and the prediction will be right on target in the future."

Solar screening

In his search for solar cells, dubbed the Clean Energy Project, Aspuru-Guzik is screening molecules for a host of properties involved in converting sunlight into electrical energy. The goal is to provide the materials that will allow organic photovoltaic cells to turn more than 10% of the solar energy that hits them into electricity, compared with about 9% for the best materials today.

That goal is still lower than the conversion ratio achieved by modern cells made from silicon, but organic photovoltaics would be cheaper and could be used in fabrics, plastics and even inks and paints. Commercial organic photovoltaic cells could hit the market within a few years. Some believe their cheapness and versatility will make them especially useful in the developing world.

The Harvard team is running its quantum-mechanical computations through IBM's World Community Grid, which harnesses idle time on volunteers' personal computers. So far, the initiative has inspected 2.3 million molecules, and should reach the 3.5-million mark next year.

That is probably the largest set of quantum calculations ever conducted in chemistry, says Aspuru-Guzik. His team is also running its own calculations, looking at simple structural and chemical properties.

The screening has already begun to reveal some potentially interesting new compounds and structural families, including various molecules containing selenium. The team plans to publish the top 1,000 candidates in the next few months.

Aspuru-Guzik is confident that the list will bear fruit. "If I'm wrong," he adds, "here is my head on the chopping block."

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on August 16, 2011.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe