Hybrid Vaccine Protects Mice from West Nile Virus

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have developed a vaccine that protects mice against West Nile virus (WNV), according to a report published in the current edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Tests of the vaccine in monkeys are slated to begin next month, and human trials could start before the year is out.

The mosquito-borne WNV, which in humans can cause potentially deadly encephalitis, first appeared in North America in 1999. Since then it has claimed the lives of seven people and made 80 others seriously ill. To develop the vaccine, Alexander Pletnev of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and his colleagues enlisted the help of WNV's close cousin, dengue virus, which does not attack the central nervous system. By substituting certain WNV genes with the dengue variety, the team created a hybrid virus that stimulates a strong immune response without infecting the brain. None of the mice that received the hybrid vaccine developed WNV when later exposed to it.

Because one of the dengue viruses used in the construction of the hybrid virus has already been shown to be safe in humans, the researchers hope that their vaccine will advance swiftly to human clinical trials. "We must remain vigilant and act quickly if we are to keep ahead of emerging and re-emerging infectious agents such as West Nile virus," says NIAID director Anthony Fauci. "Disease-causing microbes will continue to adapt and continue to thrive, so we cannot let down our guard."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe