Hydraulic Rams

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS. EDITORS In No. 7, page 53, of the Scientific American, you appeal to your Pennsylvania friends, by whom you doubtless mean Mr. Birkinbine and myself, to answer a communication you received trom J. D. Rice, of Philadelphia ; I have waited until this time to see what reply Mr. Birkinbine would make to this appeal, but as he has made none, I feel compelled, in self-defence to state how far this communication has any reference to me. As to the ram at Naples, N. Y., I never had any thing to do with it, and the first intimation I ever had of its not succeeding, was through the communication of Mr. Rice. All that I had to do with the ram at Girard College, was to calculate and make a draught of the curve of quickest descent for the driving pipe ; this I did at the request of Mr. Henry Tatham, who took a deep interest in the concern, and recommended the works to be erected, and through whom I sent the calculations and draught to Mr. Birkinbine, who, I infer from letters I received from him afterwards, laid it out accordingly. I understand, by those who ought to know, that this ram was discontinued only on account of the feed-water becoming too small for the increased demand, and not to anything depending on either Mr. Birkinbine or myself. If I have stated, above, anything incorrect, Mr. Birkinbine can correct me. JOSEPH C. STRODE.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 17This article was published with the title “Hydraulic Rams” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 17 (), p. 130
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01081853-130a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe