New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Ice-Diving Drones Embark on Risky Antarctic Mission

To forecast sea level rise, a flotilla of robot subs must map the unseen bottom of a melting ice shelf—if they are not sunk by it

One of the autonomous floats deployed under the ice.

Paul G. Allen Philanthropies

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Deep below the bright, smooth surface of Antarctica's ice shelves lies a dark landscape unlike any other on earth, where inverted canyons and terraces reach far up into the ice. Fed by glaciers on land, these giant ice ledges float on the Southern Ocean's frigid waters. This year a fleet of seven underwater robots developed by the University of Washington headed into this world on a risky mission. Their goal: to help forecast sea-level rises by observing the melting process in this hidden topsy-turvy landscape, where layers of warm and cool water mix.

“We have known for about 40 years that ice shelves are intrinsically unstable,” says Knut Christianson, a glaciologist on the mission and a leader of U.W.'s Future of Ice initiative. “But we do not really understand the variability of these systems, let alone how they react to a significant external [force] such as warming sea temperatures.”

Previous efforts to explore the undersides of ice shelves have involved scientists drilling through them or sending robotic submarines on short trips below them. But these efforts have been restricted to small areas and brief periods—snapshots that do not necessarily reflect the full behavior of the ice-and-water system, Christianson says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new team of robotic explorers consists of three self-propelled drones, called Seagliders, accompanied by four drifting floats. All the vehicles contain instruments that measure temperature, pressure, turbulence and dissolved oxygen. Each of the $100,000 Seagliders will follow a several-week route under, around and back from the ice shelves. The drones swim by adjusting their buoyancy and wings to glide slowly in a programmed direction. The $30,000 floats, in contrast, are at the mercy of ocean currents; they can regulate their movement only to rise or sink.

If a drone or float rises into a crevasse or gets trapped under one of the terraces, it has no escape plan and cannot call back for help. “It's a very risky prospect,” says Mick West, an engineer at the Georgia Tech Research Institute, who was not involved in the U.W. work but whose team dropped a tethered robot through Antarctica's Ross Ice Shelf in 2015.

If any drones do get lost, the U.W. scientists plan to return in 2019 to collect them. If they cannot be found, they have enough battery life to operate for another year—and any that come up later might be retrieved by other researchers and returned. But long before that, Christianson anticipates using data from the robots to improve models for the planet's rising sea levels.

Mark Harris is a science and technology writer based in Seattle. He wrote "Waves of Destruction" in the May 2015 issue of Scientific American.

More by Mark Harris
Scientific American Magazine Vol 318 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Ice-Diving Drones” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 318 No. 3 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0318-16a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe