Icelandic Weather System May Explain Melting Arctic Ice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER

Sea ice in the Arctic has without doubt dwindled during the past 20 years, but the cause is not entirely clear. Although some scientists have pointed the finger squarely at global warming, a new study in the current issue of Polar Geography suggests that a low-pressure weather system near Iceland too deserves some blame. This low¿which together with the Bermuda-Azores High drives the so-called North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)¿pulls warm air into the Arctic to the east of Iceland and flushes out cold air to the west. "When the Icelandic Low is weak, it will still bring warm air northward," says study author Claire Parkinson of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, "but not as much as when the Icelandic Low is strong."

Parkinson analyzed two decades worth of satellite data to track variations in Arctic sea ice. Whereas the overall amount decreased between 1979 and 1999, regional differences indicated that local factors other than climate warming were involved. In particular, she found that as the Icelandic Low grew stronger between 1979 and 1990, it helped warm the Arctic and ice levels dropped off (top image). During the following decade, however, the situation reversed (bottom image). "This regional pattern of reversals in the ice extent trends is highly suggestive of an Icelandic Low impact, or more broadly, of an impact from the NAO," Parkinson says. "Whether the ice cover as a whole will continue to exhibit the decreases that it experienced over the 1979 to 1999 period might depend on the strength and phase of the NAO, as well as on long-term trends in the climate system."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe