New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Icelandic Weather System May Explain Melting Arctic Ice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER

Sea ice in the Arctic has without doubt dwindled during the past 20 years, but the cause is not entirely clear. Although some scientists have pointed the finger squarely at global warming, a new study in the current issue of Polar Geography suggests that a low-pressure weather system near Iceland too deserves some blame. This low¿which together with the Bermuda-Azores High drives the so-called North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)¿pulls warm air into the Arctic to the east of Iceland and flushes out cold air to the west. "When the Icelandic Low is weak, it will still bring warm air northward," says study author Claire Parkinson of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, "but not as much as when the Icelandic Low is strong."

Parkinson analyzed two decades worth of satellite data to track variations in Arctic sea ice. Whereas the overall amount decreased between 1979 and 1999, regional differences indicated that local factors other than climate warming were involved. In particular, she found that as the Icelandic Low grew stronger between 1979 and 1990, it helped warm the Arctic and ice levels dropped off (top image). During the following decade, however, the situation reversed (bottom image). "This regional pattern of reversals in the ice extent trends is highly suggestive of an Icelandic Low impact, or more broadly, of an impact from the NAO," Parkinson says. "Whether the ice cover as a whole will continue to exhibit the decreases that it experienced over the 1979 to 1999 period might depend on the strength and phase of the NAO, as well as on long-term trends in the climate system."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe