New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

IEA Now Predicts Oil and Gas Demand Will Rise beyond 2030, Departing from Previous Forecasts

The International Energy Agency says weak climate action and energy security fears are effectively delaying peak fossil fuel consumption

Five oil derricks silhouetted against the setting sun and a cloudy sky

Oil derricks in Brazil.

Anton Petrus/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The International Energy Agency predicts global demand for oil and gas will rise well beyond 2030, marking a sharp departure from the agency’s previous forecasts that demand for oil would peak by 2030.

In a new report, the IEA says low gas prices, growing concerns over energy security and a global lack of ambitious climate policies will delay the peak of the fossil fuel era until at least 2050.

The report comes as world leaders meet in Brazil for this year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, where extreme heat, President Donald Trump’s broad reversal of the U.S.’s climate action policy and a slowing of action to curb emissions are high on the agenda. Last year was the hottest on record and the first to exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, the report shows. The IEA projects that under current policies, the world is on track for 2.5 to three degrees C of warming by 2100, far above the 2015 Paris Agreement goal of keeping global temperatures below two degrees C.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The report warns that the 1.5-degree-C target will be out of reach without the removal of carbon dioxide with technologies such as carbon sequestration. The agency says that if countries rapidly scale up renewables, energy efficiency and clean fuel use, however, further warming may still be preventable.

Climate advocates have pointed to other mitigation efforts beyond policy that could muddy the IEA’s forecasting. “There’s a revolution happening right now and it’s in renewables and electrification,” said Dave Jones, chief analyst at Ember, a London-based energy research organization, to the New York Times. “Scenarios based on policies and legislation are behind the curve of technology change.”

Humberto Basilio is a Mexican science journalist covering policy, health, misconduct, archaeology and the environment. He is also a former news intern at Scientific American. His work has been published in the New York Times, National Geographic, Science, Nature, and more.

More by Humberto Basilio

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe