If we cannot see electrons and protons -- or smaller particles such as quarks -- how can we be sure they exist?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Stephen Reucroft and John Swain, professors of physics at Northeastern University in Boston, Mass, teamed up to provide this answer:

The central concept here is what we mean by "see." Normally when we say that we "see" an object, what we mean is that we detect with our eyes particles of light called photons, which come from some source like a lightbulb or the sun and bounce off the object.

The idea of being able to "see" things by observing particles that scatter from them is common to particle physics experiments that study tiny objects like electrons, protons, and quarks (out of which protons are made).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For a classical physics picture of how this works, you might imagine being in a large dark room with an object whose shape you don't know. If you have a bucket of tennis balls, you can start to build up a picture of what the object looks like by tossing the balls at it. Instead of tennis balls, particle physicists use small particles, such as electrons at very high energies. Recalling Albert Einstein's famous formula, E=mc2, lots of energy can be traded for a little bit of matter.

So when we use very high energies to see deeply into matter a new phenomenon can occur: not only do we see what's there, but we create matter in the form of new particles. This gives us yet another way to study the structure of the world at its most profound level.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe