Images Reveal Wild 2 Is Unique Kind of Comet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On January 2, NASA's Stardust spacecraft passed within 240 kilometers of Comet Wild 2. Donald E. Brownlee of the University of Washington and his collaborators have since analyzed 72 photographs taken during the 20,900 kilometer-per-hour flyby and their findings seem to contradict one popular theory for the makeup of comets.

The researchers mapped the surface of the 4.8-kilometer-wide comet nucleus, whose oblate shape resembles a homemade hamburger patty. In the latest issue of the journal Science they report that the surface is pockmarked with craters, some more than 1.6 kilometers across. ¿None of these craters looked like what we see on other astronomical bodies,¿ Brownlee remarks. To determine the origin of the strange depressions, the scientists ran experiments in a lab to simulate how the craters might have formed. What they found was that the holes on the surface were consistent with high-velocity collisions between the comet and smaller meteoritelike objects. These impacts most likely occurred billions of years ago when Wild 2 (pronounced ¿vilt¿ 2) was in the Kuiper belt, a donut-shaped region outside the orbit of Neptune that is one source of comets.

The existence of the craters, as well as the discovery of steep cliffs and pinnacles on the comet's landscape, imply that Wild 2 is a cohesive structure as opposed to a loosely connected rubble pile. The fact that Jupiter's gravitational field pulled apart Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 in 1993 supported the theory that comets are an assemblage of debris weakly held together by gravity. But the new results instead suggest that a comet's structure evolves from a solid boulder to a tenuous collection of rocks as it gradually wanders in from the outskirts of the solar system toward the sun.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Data collected by other instruments on the Stardust spacecraft promise to further develop scientists' understanding of comets. For example, another research team has already analyzed the gas and dust emitted by Wild 2, and astronomers look forward to January 2006 when a Stardust capsule containing thousands of comet dust particles will return to Earth for more thorough investigation.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe