New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Images Reveal Wild 2 Is Unique Kind of Comet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On January 2, NASA's Stardust spacecraft passed within 240 kilometers of Comet Wild 2. Donald E. Brownlee of the University of Washington and his collaborators have since analyzed 72 photographs taken during the 20,900 kilometer-per-hour flyby and their findings seem to contradict one popular theory for the makeup of comets.

The researchers mapped the surface of the 4.8-kilometer-wide comet nucleus, whose oblate shape resembles a homemade hamburger patty. In the latest issue of the journal Science they report that the surface is pockmarked with craters, some more than 1.6 kilometers across. ¿None of these craters looked like what we see on other astronomical bodies,¿ Brownlee remarks. To determine the origin of the strange depressions, the scientists ran experiments in a lab to simulate how the craters might have formed. What they found was that the holes on the surface were consistent with high-velocity collisions between the comet and smaller meteoritelike objects. These impacts most likely occurred billions of years ago when Wild 2 (pronounced ¿vilt¿ 2) was in the Kuiper belt, a donut-shaped region outside the orbit of Neptune that is one source of comets.

The existence of the craters, as well as the discovery of steep cliffs and pinnacles on the comet's landscape, imply that Wild 2 is a cohesive structure as opposed to a loosely connected rubble pile. The fact that Jupiter's gravitational field pulled apart Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 in 1993 supported the theory that comets are an assemblage of debris weakly held together by gravity. But the new results instead suggest that a comet's structure evolves from a solid boulder to a tenuous collection of rocks as it gradually wanders in from the outskirts of the solar system toward the sun.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Data collected by other instruments on the Stardust spacecraft promise to further develop scientists' understanding of comets. For example, another research team has already analyzed the gas and dust emitted by Wild 2, and astronomers look forward to January 2006 when a Stardust capsule containing thousands of comet dust particles will return to Earth for more thorough investigation.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe