Immune System Memory

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After fighting off an infection, the body¿s immune system goes a step further: it remembers the invader so that the next time it detects that same pathogen, it can launch a swift and effective counterattack. That much is known. The details of how these actions are controlled, however, have remained largely mysterious. But a report published today in the journal Science is shedding light on the matter. According to the new study, two molecules previously known to take part in the fight against infections, perforin and interferon gamma, also direct the size and nature of the initial immune response and subsequent immune memory.

Microbiologist John Harty of the University of Iowa and his colleagues measured levels of immune system cells called T cells during the various stages of infection in mice that had been genetically engineered to lack either perforin or interferon gamma, or both molecules. Perforin, they found, controls the number of T cells created to fight the infection; interferon gamma takes care of eliminating most of those cells after they have conquered the invader. (About 10 percent of the T cells are maintained as memory cells.) Harty notes that this T cell death stage is particularly important because "it allows us to respond to many different pathogens without exhausting our immune system."

"Understanding how the basic biology of the system is regulated provides insight into how we might manipulate the system," Harty says. "In the case of these studies, the ultimate goal would be to learn how to manipulate the levels of T cell memory, which could result in better, more effective vaccinations."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe