Impact Craters May Have Cradled Life on Earth

Asteroid and comet impacts could have destroyed some habitats for life while also creating new ones for bacteria

This story was originally published by Inside Science News Service.

(Inside Science) – Asteroid and comet impacts could have created refuges for early life on Earth, protecting the first microorganisms from the sun’s harsh rays when the planet still lacked an ozone shield.

“Most people associate impacts with the extinction of the dinosaurs, but they can also be beneficial to life,” said Gordon Osinski, a geologist at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Osinski is a coauthor of a new study, published in the current issue of the journal Astrobiology, that looked at “impact-shocked” rocks from Haughton Crater in Canada, a 14-mile wide depression created by a comet or asteroid crashing into Earth between 23 to 39 million years ago. The team found that, in general, rock samples that were exposed to higher pressures during the impact contained more microscopic pores and harbored higher numbers of photosynthetic cyanobacteria that had evolved to colonize the tiny rock crevices.

“We speculated that this was the case in the past, but we’ve never had the hard data before,” Osinski said.

Using a spectrometer, the team also showed that shocked rocks were better at blocking biologically damaging ultraviolet rays while still allowing enough light through to sustain the microbes, which rely on sunlight to survive.

“When you shock the rock, you fracture its crystal structure so that [ultraviolet] light ends up bouncing all around the rock and less of it gets transmitted through the rock,” said study first author Alexandra Pontefract, a researcher in Osinski’s lab.

As far as scientists know, impact craters are the only environments that can transform rocks in this way.

“This is a unique process,” Osinski said. “Even the most violent volcanic eruptions you can think of don’t come anywhere near generating the pressures that you get during these impact events.”

The team’s study of rocks at Haughton Crater revealed that there was a “sweet spot” of impact pressures for creating the most ideal habitats for microorganisms.

“You don’t want the rocks to be completely melted and obliterated, but at the same time, a little bit of shock doesn’t do much either,” Osinski said.

While giant asteroid impacts would spell doom for many species today, they may have played an important role in helping jumpstart the first life billions years ago, when life’s toehold on Earth was still very tenuous. Impact sites could have been especially crucial for life during a period about four billion years ago, known as the Late Heavy Bombardment, when the newly-formed Earth was hammered by swarms of asteroids and comets.

Not only would shocked rocks have offered shelter against harmful ultraviolet light at time when Earth still lacked a protective atmosphere, asteroid and comet impacts would have created hydrothermal systems that could have helped sustain life by providing sources of heat, water, and nutrients, Osinski said.

“Because of the huge amount of energy from impacts, you can create kilometers of liquid molten magma that can take a long time to cool down. And these hot rocks can heat up water, and as the water warms and cools, you can get a circulation going,” he added.

“Until about a decade ago, the only way to generate hydrothermal systems that we knew of was in volcanic settings. But we’ve since been able to show that impacts also generate hydrothermal systems.”

The ability of impacts to create hydrothermal vent systems is a major reason why scientists scouting out landing sites for the next European Space Agency mission to Mars, in which the search for signs of ancient Martian life is a major goal, are very interested in craters, said John Parnell, a geologist at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland who was not involved in the study.

Parnell said this latest evidence that impact-shocked rocks offer protection against deadly UV exposure is yet another point in favor of investigating Martian craters.

“This is one more reason in a list of many as to why you look at impact craters on Mars for signs of life,” Parnell said.

Copyright 2014 American Institute of Physics. Copyright conditions and usage terms are subject to change at any time without consent or any type of prior notice.


More on astrobiology and origins of life on Earth: Astrobiology: We are the Aliens Did Life Come from Another World? Earth's Oldest and Biggest Crater Yields New Secrets The Way the Life of the Earth Came Forth (1864 - archive access required)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe