New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Impacts of Global Biofuel Boom Remain Murky

The United Nations Environment Programme finds research into biofuels impacts on dead zones, biodiversity and a range of other environmental issues lacking

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A U.N. panel said today that biofuels' effects on air and water have not been sufficiently explored despite growing global production.

The U.N. Environment Programme's report concludes that so-called lifecycle assessments must go beyond calculating greenhouse gas emissions and consider how agricultural production of feedstocks affect the acidification and nutrient loading of waterways.

"The available knowledge from life-cycle-assessments ... seems limited, despite the fact that for those issues many biofuels cause higher environmental pressures than fossil fuels," the report says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"From a representative sample of [lifecycle] studies on biofuels, less than one third presented results for acidification and eutrophication, and only a few for toxicity potential (either human toxicity or eco-toxicity, or both), summer smog, ozone depletion or abiotic resource depletion potential, and none on biodiversity," it adds.

The study is the second major report this month calling for greater research on the environmental effects of producing ethanol and other renewable transportation fuels.

A Government Accountability Office report released Oct. 2 said Congress should require U.S. EPA to consider a wider range of environmental effects when deciding which fuels are eligible under the federal biofuels use mandate (E&ENews PM, Oct. 2).

The topic is one of many covered in the broad UNEP survey of issues surrounding "sustainable" production and use of biofuels and notes wide variation in greenhouse gas emissions reductions and increases that biofuels can spur.

It warns that some biofuels production methods can cause large increases in greenhouse gas emissions, such as clearing Indonesian rainforest to grow palm plantations for biodiesel.

The study examines options for lessening the effects of expanding agricultural production prompted by fuels, such as using currently marginal or degraded land for fuels feedstock production.

The report is the product of UNEP's International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management.

"Biofuels are neither a panacea nor a pariah but like all technologies they represent both opportunities and challenges," Achim Steiner, U.N. undersecretary-general and UNEP executive director, said in a statement.

"Therefore a more sophisticated debate is urgently needed which is what this first report by the Panel is intended to provide," he added. "On one level, it is a debate about which energy crops to grow and where, and also about the way different countries and biofuel companies promote and manage the production and conversion of plant materials for energy purposes -- some clearly are climate friendly while others are highly questionable."

Biofuels use in the United States and elsewhere has grown considerably in recent years. Global ethanol production tripled between 2000 and 2007 from 17 billion to more than 52 billion liters. Biofuels still provide 1.8 percent of transportation fuels globally.

Growth in biofuels production and use is driven by mandates in many countries. The United States expanded its federal biofuels mandate in a 2007 law to reach 36 billion gallons by 2022, with up to 15 billion gallons coming from corn ethanol and the balance from so-called advanced biofuels like cellulosic ethanol.

However, these next-wave fuels have not yet reached commercial-scale production, although a number of projects are under development.

Click here to read the report.

Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe